These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 812767)

  • 1. Selection for high adult body weight in Drosophila populations with different structures.
    Katz AJ; Young SS
    Genetics; 1975 Sep; 81(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 812767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response to selection from new mutation and effective size of partially inbred populations. II. Experiments with Drosophila melanogaster.
    Merchante M; Caballero A; López-Fanjul C
    Genet Res; 1995 Dec; 66(3):227-40. PubMed ID: 8600019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased selection response in larger populations. I. Selection for wing-tip height in Drosophila melanogaster at three population sizes.
    Weber KE
    Genetics; 1990 Jul; 125(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 2116358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Analysis of responses in the thorax selection lines.
    Bos M; Scharloo W
    Genetics; 1973 Dec; 75(4):695-708. PubMed ID: 4205048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Studies on the scutellar bristles of Drosophila melanogaster. II. Long-term selection for high bristle number in the Oregon RC strain and correlated responses in abdominal chaetae.
    Sheldon BL; Milton MK
    Genetics; 1972 Aug; 71(4):567-95. PubMed ID: 4626652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of disruptive and stabilizing selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Mean values and variances.
    Bos M; Scharloo W
    Genetics; 1973 Dec; 75(4):679-93. PubMed ID: 4205047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased selection response in larger populations. II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes.
    Weber KE; Diggins LT
    Genetics; 1990 Jul; 125(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 2116359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Homozygosity, effective number of alleles, and interdeme differentiation in subdivided populations.
    Nagylaki T
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1985 Dec; 82(24):8611-3. PubMed ID: 3866243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic divergence under uniform selection. II. Different responses to selection for knockdown resistance to ethanol among Drosophila melanogaster populations and their replicate lines.
    Cohan FM; Hoffmann AA
    Genetics; 1986 Sep; 114(1):145-64. PubMed ID: 3095180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The many-demes limit for selection and drift in a subdivided population.
    Wakeley J; Takahashi T
    Theor Popul Biol; 2004 Sep; 66(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 15302218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correlated responses to selection on body size in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Partridge L; Langelan R; Fowler K; Zwaan B; French V
    Genet Res; 1999 Aug; 74(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 10505406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selection for recombination in structured populations.
    Martin G; Otto SP; Lenormand T
    Genetics; 2006 Jan; 172(1):593-609. PubMed ID: 15944358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The direct response of Drosophila melanogaster to selection on knockdown temperature.
    Gilchrist GW; Huey RB
    Heredity (Edinb); 1999 Jul; 83 ( Pt 1)():15-29. PubMed ID: 10447699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental variation, fluctuating selection and genetic drift in subdivided populations.
    Taylor JE
    Theor Popul Biol; 2008 Nov; 74(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 18692081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of 28 generations of selection for reproduction, growth, and carcass traits in swine.
    Hsu WL; Johnson RK
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):4806-22. PubMed ID: 25349336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of population size and selection intensity on responses to disruptive selection in Drosophila melangaster.
    Barker JS; Karlsson LJ
    Genetics; 1974 Oct; 78(2):715-35. PubMed ID: 4217303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ten generations of selection for predicted weight of testes in swine: direct response and correlated response in body weight, backfat, age at puberty, and ovulation rate.
    Johnson RK; Eckardt GR; Rathje TA; Drudik DK
    J Anim Sci; 1994 Aug; 72(8):1978-88. PubMed ID: 7982825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Large genetic change at small fitness cost in large populations of Drosophila melanogaster selected for wind tunnel flight: rethinking fitness surfaces.
    Weber KE
    Genetics; 1996 Sep; 144(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 8878686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Adaptability of experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster in directed and stabilizing selection].
    Lazebnyĭ OE; Imasheva AG; Zhivotovskiĭ LA
    Genetika; 1991 Oct; 27(10):1726-32. PubMed ID: 1778451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spontaneous mutation for a quantitative trait in Drosophila melanogaster. I. Response to artificial selection.
    López MA; López-Fanjul C
    Genet Res; 1993 Apr; 61(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 8319900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.