These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8128002)

  • 1. Biological considerations for combining carcinogenicity data for quantitative risk assessment.
    Vater ST; McGinnis PM; Schoeny RS; Velazquez SF
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):403-18. PubMed ID: 8128002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are tumor incidence rates from chronic bioassays telling us what we need to know about carcinogens?
    Gaylor DW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Mar; 41(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 15698536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case study of cancer data set combinations for PCBs.
    Vater ST; Velazquez SF; Cogliano VJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Aug; 22(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 7494898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A statistical test of compatibility of data sets to a common dose-response model.
    Stiteler WM; Knauf LA; Hertzberg RC; Schoeny RS
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1993 Dec; 18(3):392-402. PubMed ID: 8128001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles.
    Kirkland D; Aardema M; Müller L; Makoto H
    Mutat Res; 2006 Sep; 608(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16769241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of cancer slope factors using different statistical approaches.
    Subramaniam RP; White P; Cogliano VJ
    Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 16834636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Issues in the design and interpretation of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity studies in rodents: approaches to dose selection.
    Rhomberg LR; Baetcke K; Blancato J; Bus J; Cohen S; Conolly R; Dixit R; Doe J; Ekelman K; Fenner-Crisp P; Harvey P; Hattis D; Jacobs A; Jacobson-Kram D; Lewandowski T; Liteplo R; Pelkonen O; Rice J; Somers D; Turturro A; West W; Olin S
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2007; 37(9):729-837. PubMed ID: 17957539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species differences in carcinogenicity: the role of metabolism and pharmacokinetics in risk assessment.
    Green T
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 1991; 27(4):595-9. PubMed ID: 1820731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination of cancer data in quantitative risk assessments: case study using bromodichloromethane.
    Velazquez SF; McGinnis PM; Vater ST; Stiteler WS; Knauf LA; Schoeny RS
    Risk Anal; 1994 Jun; 14(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 8029500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NTP technical report on the toxicity studies of methacrylonitrile (CAS No. 126-98-7). Administered by gavage to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice.
    Ghanayem BI
    Toxic Rep Ser; 2000 May; (47):1-56, A1-E6. PubMed ID: 11803706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acrylamide: review of toxicity data and dose-response analyses for cancer and noncancer effects.
    Shipp A; Lawrence G; Gentry R; McDonald T; Bartow H; Bounds J; Macdonald N; Clewell H; Allen B; Van Landingham C
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2006; 36(6-7):481-608. PubMed ID: 16973444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing.
    Thybaud V; Aardema M; Clements J; Dearfield K; Galloway S; Hayashi M; Jacobson-Kram D; Kirkland D; MacGregor JT; Marzin D; Ohyama W; Schuler M; Suzuki H; Zeiger E;
    Mutat Res; 2007 Feb; 627(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 17126066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of rodent carcinogenic potential of naturally occurring chemicals in the human diet using high-throughput QSAR predictive modeling.
    Valerio LG; Arvidson KB; Chanderbhan RF; Contrera JF
    Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2007 Jul; 222(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17482223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Precision of estimates of an ADI (or TDI or PTWI).
    Speijers GJ
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1999 Oct; 30(2 Pt 2):S87-93. PubMed ID: 10597619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods for deriving pesticide aquatic life criteria.
    TenBrook PL; Tjeerdema RS; Hann P; Karkoski J
    Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2009; 199():19-109. PubMed ID: 19110939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of carcinogen hazard characterisation based on animal studies and epidemiology.
    Sanner T; Dybing E
    Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 96(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 15667598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The results of assays in Drosophila as indicators of exposure to carcinogens.
    Vogel EW; Graf U; Frei HJ; Nivard MM
    IARC Sci Publ; 1999; (146):427-70. PubMed ID: 10353398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the carcinogenicity of 1,1-dichloroethylene (vinylidene chloride).
    Roberts SM; Jordan KE; Warren DA; Britt JK; James RC
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Feb; 35(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 11846635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cancer dose--response assessment for acrylonitrile based upon rodent brain tumor incidence: use of epidemiologic, mechanistic, and pharmacokinetic support for nonlinearity.
    Kirman CR; Gargas ML; Marsh GM; Strother DE; Klaunig JE; Collins JJ; Deskin R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2005 Oct; 43(1):85-103. PubMed ID: 16099568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.