These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
13. [Review and use of decision rules for bioequivalence trials]. Nicolas P; Tod M; Petitjean O Therapie; 1993; 48(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 8356540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mean difference vs. variability reduction: tradeoffs in aggregate measures for individual bioequivalence. FDA Individual Bioequivalence Working Group. Hauck WW; Chen ML; Hyslop T; Patnaik R; Schuirmann D; Williams R Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Dec; 34(12):535-41. PubMed ID: 8996848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the concentration curves directly in a pharmacokinetics, bioavailability/bioequivalence study. Liao JJ Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(6):883-91. PubMed ID: 15558699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size considerations for assessing individual bioequivalence based on the method of tolerance intervals. Esinhart JD; Chinchilli VM Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1994 Jan; 32(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 8199749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian modeling of multivariate average bioequivalence. Ghosh P; Gönen M Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2402-19. PubMed ID: 18095275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sample size determination for the two one-sided tests procedure in bioequivalence. Liu JP; Chow SC J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1992 Feb; 20(1):101-4. PubMed ID: 1588502 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [What model for pharmacokinetic analysis of tissue distribution and bioequivalence?]. Marzo A; Monti NC Boll Chim Farm; 1998 Mar; 137(3):69-73. PubMed ID: 9611844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]