These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8129252)

  • 1. The disintegration of absorbable suture materials on exposure to human digestive juices: an update.
    Tian F; Appert HE; Howard JM
    Am Surg; 1994 Apr; 60(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 8129252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.
    Muftuoglu MA; Ozkan E; Saglam A
    Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of absorbable suture materials in biliary tract surgery.
    Sugimachi K; Sufian S; Weiss MJ; Pavlides CA; Matsumoto T
    Int Surg; 1978 Mar; 63(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 415997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of different absorbable sutures on healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses.
    Deveney KE; Way LW
    Am J Surg; 1977 Jan; 133(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 835784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The disintegration of surgical sutures on exposure to pancreatic juice.
    Mizuma K; Lee PC; Howard JM
    Ann Surg; 1977 Dec; 186(6):718-22. PubMed ID: 304708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Experimental studies on the usefulness of Dexon (polyglycolic acid) and our own modified suture method for suturing after tendon severing].
    Minta P
    Z Exp Chir; 1980; 13(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 6255691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dexon versus chromic catgut-Mersilene simultaneously employed for gastro-intestinal anastomoses, evaluated endoscopically.
    Schoubye J
    Acta Chir Scand; 1978; 144(7-8):441-3. PubMed ID: 371317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W; Hastings JC; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Experimental comparison of Maxon and chromic catgut in suturing of the urinary bladder].
    Osterhage HR; Grün BR; Judmann G; Wünsch HP
    Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 3284147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Suture material in vaginal hysterectomy].
    Tsuji A; Ohta C; Ohta Y
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Jan; 37(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 3973429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Absorbable suture materials for vascular anastomoses. Tensile strength and axial pressure studies using polyglycolic acid sutures.
    Ross G; Pavlides C; Long F; Kusaba A; Perlman M; Matsumoto T
    Am Surg; 1981 Dec; 47(12):541-7. PubMed ID: 6274234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two suture materials, Dexon Plus and Maxon, in abdominal hysterectomy.
    Kiilholma P; Mäkinen J; Tenho T; Pitkänen Y; Hirvonen T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl; 1994; 208():47-9. PubMed ID: 8092771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of wound strength in normal, radiated and infected tissues closed with polyglycolic and chromic catgut sutures.
    Barham RE; Butz GW; Ansell JS
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Jun; 146(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 653565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of chitin as a new absorbable suture material--an experimental study.
    Tachibana M; Yaita A; Taniura H; Fukasawa K; Nagasue N; Nakamura T
    Jpn J Surg; 1988 Sep; 18(5):533-9. PubMed ID: 2852731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.