These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8130713)

  • 1. The effect of different sampling devices on the presence of endocervical cells in cervical smears. A systematic literature review.
    Buntinx F; Knottnerus JA; André J; Crebolder HF; Essed GG
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1994 Jan; 3(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 8130713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cytology: a randomized comparison of four sampling methods.
    McCord ML; Stovall TG; Meric JL; Summitt RL; Coleman SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1772-7; discussion 1777-9. PubMed ID: 1615986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Jarvis G; Kitchener H; Lilford R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (3):CD001036. PubMed ID: 10908482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the methods of cytobrush and Ayre spatula in the concentration of endocervical cells].
    Longatto Filho A; Maeda MY; Santos DR; de Andréa Filho A; Cavaliere MJ; Shih LW; Oyafuso MS
    Rev Paul Med; 1991; 109(3):93-6. PubMed ID: 1947611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Cytobrush sampling, spatula sampling and combined Cytobrush-spatula sampling of the uterine cervix.
    Buntinx F; Boon ME; Beck S; Knottnerus JA; Essed GG
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 1994637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The unicum and cytobrush plus spatula for cervical cytologic sampling: a comparison.
    Broso PR; Buffetti G; Fabbrini T; Francone P; Orlassino R
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(2):222-5. PubMed ID: 8629402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Cytobrush effect on Pap smear adequacy.
    Davey-Sullivan B; Gearhart J; Evers CG; Cason Z; Replogle WH
    Fam Pract Res J; 1991 Mar; 11(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 2028815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exact Touch: a new device for cervical cytology. Comparison with Ayre spatula plus Cytobrush.
    de Palo G; Stefanon B; Alasio L; Pilotti S
    Cytopathology; 2000 Oct; 11(5):322-5. PubMed ID: 11014659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved endocervical sampling with the Cytobrush.
    Chalvardjian A; De Marchi WG; Bell V; Nishikawa R
    CMAJ; 1991 Feb; 144(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 1989710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Cytobrush plus plastic spatula with the Cervex Brush for obtaining endocervical cells.
    Cannon JM; Blythe JG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Oct; 82(4 Pt 1):569-72. PubMed ID: 8377984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized trial of the sleeved cytobrush and the endocervical curette.
    Boardman LA; Meinz H; Steinhoff MM; Heber WW; Blume J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 101(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 12636943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears.
    Helderman G; Graham L; Cannon D; Waters K; Feller D
    Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of the Cytobrush for cervical sampling after cryotherapy.
    Hoffman MS; Gordy LW; Cavanagh D
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 1994640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
    Kawaguchi K; Nogi M; Ohya M; Nishikawa Y; Kobayashi TK
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Jarvis G; Kitchener H; Lilford R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; 2000(2):CD001036. PubMed ID: 10796736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The efficiency of the cytobrush and cotton swab in obtaining endocervical cells in smears taken after conization of the cervix.
    Kristensen GB; Jensen LK; Ejersbo D; Hølund B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 246(4):207-10. PubMed ID: 2619334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of five sampling methods for the preparation of cervical smears.
    Boon ME; de Graaff Guilloud JC; Rietveld WJ
    Acta Cytol; 1989; 33(6):843-8. PubMed ID: 2588917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical smears following laser treatment. Comparison of Cervex brush versus Cytobrush-Ayre spatula sampling.
    Szarewski A; Cuzick J; Singer A
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 1994639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of spatula and nonspatula methods for cervical sampling.
    Rammou-Kinia R; Anagnostopoulou I; Gomousa M
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 1994638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and Cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology. Improvements in smear quality and detection rates.
    Boon ME; Alons-van Kordelaar JJ; Rietveld-Scheffers PE
    Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 3521176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.