These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8131284)

  • 1. Evaluating test methods by estimating total error.
    Chinchilli VM; Miller WG
    Clin Chem; 1994 Mar; 40(3):464-71. PubMed ID: 8131284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eight compact analysis systems evaluated for measuring total cholesterol.
    Gregory LC; Duh SH; Christenson RH
    Clin Chem; 1994 Apr; 40(4):579-85. PubMed ID: 8149614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tolerance limits for short-term analytical bias and analytical imprecision derived from clinical assay specificity.
    Klee GG
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1514-8. PubMed ID: 8330413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of current National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines for total cholesterol triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol measurements.
    Caudill SP; Cooper GR; Smith SJ; Myers GL
    Clin Chem; 1998 Aug; 44(8 Pt 1):1650-8. PubMed ID: 9702951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of two compact analyzers used for lipid analysis.
    McKenney JM; Fary DF; Miller G; Proctor JD; Chinchili VM
    J Fam Pract; 1993 May; 36(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 8482937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analytical goals for rectilinear calibration functions.
    Fuentes-Arderiu X; Alía P; Machuca I
    Clin Chim Acta; 1994 Jan; 224(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 8004781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analytical goals developed from the inherent error of medical tests.
    Ross JW; Fraser MD
    Clin Chem; 1993 Jul; 39(7):1481-93; discussion 1493-4. PubMed ID: 8330410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of criteria for the evaluation of reference method values.
    Stöckl D; Reinauer H
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl; 1993; 212():16-8. PubMed ID: 8465146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analytic and clinical performance of two compact cholesterol-testing devices.
    Volles DF; McKenney JM; Miller WG; Ruffen D; Zhang D
    Pharmacotherapy; 1998; 18(1):184-92. PubMed ID: 9469692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of laboratory measurements in clinical chemistry: a study of 11 routine chemistry analytes in the College of American Pathologists Chemistry Survey with fresh frozen serum, definitive methods, and reference methods.
    Ross JW; Miller WG; Myers GL; Praestgaard J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jul; 122(7):587-608. PubMed ID: 9674541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating total analytical error and its sources. Techniques to improve method evaluation.
    Krouwer JS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1992 Jul; 116(7):726-31. PubMed ID: 1497445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Precision of a dry-chemistry method of lipid screening.
    Bowden RG; Kingery PM; Long L
    Public Health; 2006 Jun; 120(6):572-6. PubMed ID: 16730036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of seven Cholestech L.D.X analyzers for total cholesterol determinations.
    Rogers EJ; Misner L; Ockene IS; Nicolosi RJ
    Clin Chem; 1993 May; 39(5):860-4. PubMed ID: 8485877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cholesterol operational process specifications for assuring the quality required by CLIA proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Wiebe DA
    Clin Chem; 1991 Nov; 37(11):1938-44. PubMed ID: 1934469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analytical goal-setting for monitoring patients when two analytical methods are used.
    Petersen PH; Fraser CG; Westgard JO; Larsen ML
    Clin Chem; 1992 Nov; 38(11):2256-60. PubMed ID: 1424120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laboratory process specifications for assuring quality in the U.S. National Cholesterol Education Program.
    Westgard JO; Petersen PH; Wiebe DA
    Clin Chem; 1991 May; 37(5):656-61. PubMed ID: 2032319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the biases of the Korean national cholesterol proficiency test.
    Park J; Chun S; Kim JQ; Song J; Kim JJ; Min WK
    Ann Clin Lab Sci; 2010; 40(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 20124331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analytical goals for the estimation of non-Gaussian reference intervals.
    Hyltoft Petersen P; Gowans EM; Blaabjerg O; Hørder M
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 1989 Dec; 49(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 2617130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.
    Atkinson G; Nevill AM
    Sports Med; 1998 Oct; 26(4):217-38. PubMed ID: 9820922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of cholesterol measurements in Italian clinical laboratories. Joint project GISSI prevention--Italian Society of Clinical Biochemistry. SIBioC GISSI Prevenzione Group.
    Graziani MS; Ceriotti F; Carobene A; Modenese A; Ferrero C; De Giorgi E; Franzin M; Marchetti C; Brambilla P; Bertona M; Giannone D; Righetti G; Marocchi A; Prencipe L; Franzini C; Luraschi P; Mocarelli P
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1997 Apr; 35(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 9166977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.