266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8132172)
1. An approach for development of alternative test methods based on mechanisms of skin irritation.
Osborne R; Perkins MA
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Feb; 32(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 8132172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive ability of reconstructed human epidermis equivalents for the assessment of skin irritation of cosmetics.
Faller C; Bracher M; Dami N; Roguet R
Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Oct; 16(5):557-72. PubMed ID: 12206823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro skin irritation testing with human skin cell cultures.
Osborne R; Perkins MA
Toxicol In Vitro; 1991; 5(5-6):563-7. PubMed ID: 20732078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo human skin responses to consumer products and ingredients with a range of irritancy potential.
Perkins MA; Osborne R; Rana FR; Ghassemi A; Robinson MK
Toxicol Sci; 1999 Apr; 48(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 10353313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro cytotoxicity tests on cultured human skin fibroblasts to predict skin irritation potential of surfactants.
Lee JK; Kim DB; Kim JI; Kim PY
Toxicol In Vitro; 2000 Aug; 14(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 10906441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the potential skin irritation of lysine-derivative anionic surfactants using mouse fibroblasts and human keratinocytes as an alternative to animal testing.
Sanchez L; Mitjans M; Infante MR; Vinardell MP
Pharm Res; 2004 Sep; 21(9):1637-41. PubMed ID: 15497690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of primary skin irritants in vitro in a cytotoxicity model: comparison with in vivo human irritation tests.
Wilhelm KP; Böttjer B; Siegers CP
Br J Dermatol; 2001 Nov; 145(5):709-15. PubMed ID: 11736893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and intralaboratory evaluation of an in vitro human cell-based test to aid ocular irritancy assessments.
Osborne R; Perkins MA; Roberts DA
Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1995 Nov; 28(1):139-53. PubMed ID: 8566478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arachidonic acid release: an in vitro alternative for dermal irritancy testing.
DeLeo VA; Carver MP; Hong J; Fung K; Kong B; DeSalva S
Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Feb; 34(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 8606033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 18273450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro skin irritation: facts and future. State of the art review of mechanisms and models.
Welss T; Basketter DA; Schröder KR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Jun; 18(3):231-43. PubMed ID: 15046769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rat epidermal keratinocyte organotypic culture (ROC) as a model for chemically induced skin irritation testing.
Pappinen S; Pasonen-Seppänen S; Suhonen M; Tammi R; Urtti A
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol; 2005 Nov; 208(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 16239167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro testing of tensides employing monolayer cultures: a comparison with results of patch tests on human volunteers.
Benassi L; Bertazzoni G; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Jan; 40(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 9928803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of primary eye and skin irritants by in vitro cytotoxicity and phototoxicity models: an in vitro approach of new arginine-based surfactant-induced irritation.
Benavides T; Mitjans M; Martínez V; Clapés P; Infante MR; Clothier RH; Vinardell MP
Toxicology; 2004 May; 197(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 15033545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of irritant potential of shampoos using cultured human epidermal keratinocytes model and patch test reaction measured by laser Doppler flowmetry.
Eun HC; Jung SY
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Mar; 30(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 8187517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Discrimination of the irritancy potential of surfactants in vitro by two cytotoxicity assays using normal human keratinocytes, HaCaT cells and 3T3 mouse fibroblasts: correlation with in vivo data from a soap chamber assay.
Korting HC; Herzinger T; Hartinger A; Kerscher M; Angerpointner T; Maibach HI
J Dermatol Sci; 1994 Apr; 7(2):119-29. PubMed ID: 8060913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of tumour promoter-induced prostaglandin E2 release in human and rat keratinocytes.
Lawrence JN; Benford DJ
Carcinogenesis; 1995 May; 16(5):1247-51. PubMed ID: 7767993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skin2--an in vitro human skin model: the correlation between in vivo and in vitro testing of surfactants.
Demetrulias J; Donnelly T; Morhenn V; Jessee B; Hainsworth S; Casterton P; Bernhofer L; Martin K; Decker D
Exp Dermatol; 1998 Feb; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 9517918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of eye and skin irritation of arginine-derivative surfactants using different in vitro endpoints as alternatives to the in vivo assays.
Martinez V; Corsini E; Mitjans M; Pinazo A; Vinardell MP
Toxicol Lett; 2006 Jul; 164(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 16472949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro model for detecting skin irritants: methyl green-pyronine staining of human skin explant cultures.
Jacobs JJ; Lehé C; Cammans KD; Das PK; Elliott GR
Toxicol In Vitro; 2002 Oct; 16(5):581-8. PubMed ID: 12206825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
