138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8132395)
21. Comparability of different methods of retrospective exposure assessment of metals in manufacturing industries.
Rybicki BA; Johnson CC; Peterson EL; Kortsha GX; Gorell JM
Am J Ind Med; 1997 Jan; 31(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 8986252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Agreement between an expert-rated mini job exposure matrix of occupational biomechanical exposures to the lower body and technical measurements or observation: a method comparison study.
Korshøj M; Svendsen SW; Hendriksen PF; Gupta N; Holtermann A; Andersen JH; Dalbøge A; Frost P
BMJ Open; 2022 Dec; 12(12):e064035. PubMed ID: 36576183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison Between a Job-Exposure Matrix (JEM) Score and Self-Reported Exposures for Carrying Heavy Loads Over the Working Lifetime in the CONSTANCES Cohort.
Ngabirano L; Fadel M; Leclerc A; Evanoff BA; Dale AM; Roquelaure Y; Descatha A
Ann Work Expo Health; 2020 Apr; 64(4):455-460. PubMed ID: 32105298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Matgéné: a program to develop job-exposure matrices in the general population in France.
Févotte J; Dananché B; Delabre L; Ducamp S; Garras L; Houot M; Luce D; Orlowski E; Pilorget C; Lacourt A; Brochard P; Goldberg M; Imbernon E
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Oct; 55(8):865-78. PubMed ID: 21926066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Retrospective estimate of occupations exposure to solvents. Methodology used in the Epilymph study].
Cocco P
G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2003; 25(3):420-1. PubMed ID: 14582281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Development of a job exposure matrix (JEM) for the textile industry in Shanghai, China.
Wernli KJ; Astrakianakis G; Camp JE; Ray RM; Chang CK; Li GD; Thomas DB; Checkoway H; Seixas NS
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Oct; 3(10):521-9. PubMed ID: 16908453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Limitations in the use of job exposure matrices.
Olsen J
Scand J Soc Med; 1988; 16(4):205-8. PubMed ID: 3232049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of odds ratios obtained with a job-exposure matrix and individual exposure assessment with special reference to misclassification errors.
Bouyer J; Dardenne J; Hémon D
Scand J Work Environ Health; 1995 Aug; 21(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 8553000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Sharing the knowledge gained from occupational cohort studies: a call for action.
Behrens T; Mester B; Fritschi L
Occup Environ Med; 2012 Jun; 69(6):444-8. PubMed ID: 22213839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of occupational exposure using three different methods: hygiene panel, job exposure matrix (JEM), and self reports.
Benke G; Sim M; Fritschi L; Aldred G; Forbes A; Kauppinen T
Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jan; 16(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 11202032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of exposure assessment methods in a lung cancer case-control study: performance of a lifelong task-based questionnaire for asbestos and PAHs.
Bourgkard E; Wild P; Gonzalez M; Févotte J; Penven E; Paris C
Occup Environ Med; 2013 Dec; 70(12):884-91. PubMed ID: 24142972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of specific occupational asthma risks in a community-based study with special reference to single and multiple exposures.
Zock JP; Cavallé N; Kromhout H; Kennedy SM; Sunyer J; Jaén A; Muniozguren N; Payo F; Almar E; Sánchez JL; Antó JM; Kogevinas M
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 14(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 15361899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The CONSTANCES job exposure matrix based on self-reported exposure to physical risk factors: development and evaluation.
Evanoff BA; Yung M; Buckner-Petty S; Andersen JH; Roquelaure Y; Descatha A; Dale AM
Occup Environ Med; 2019 Jun; 76(6):398-406. PubMed ID: 30705110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Performance of self-reported occupational exposure compared to a job-exposure matrix approach in asthma and chronic rhinitis.
Quinlan PJ; Earnest G; Eisner MD; Yelin EH; Katz PP; Balmes JR; Blanc PD
Occup Environ Med; 2009 Mar; 66(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 18805880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods.
Tielemans E; Heederik D; Burdorf A; Vermeulen R; Veulemans H; Kromhout H; Hartog K
Occup Environ Med; 1999 Mar; 56(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 10448321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of errors in job codes on job exposure matrix-based exposure assessment in the register-based occupational cohort DOC*X.
Petersen SB; Flachs EM; Svendsen SW; Marott JL; Budtz-Jørgensen E; Hansen J; Stokholm ZA; Schlünssen V; Andersen JH; Bonde JP
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2020 May; 46(3):259-267. PubMed ID: 31642934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Automated Coding of Job Descriptions From a General Population Study: Overview of Existing Tools, Their Application and Comparison.
Wan W; Ge CB; Friesen MC; Locke SJ; Russ DE; Burstyn I; Baker CJO; Adisesh A; Lan Q; Rothman N; Huss A; van Tongeren M; Vermeulen R; Peters S
Ann Work Expo Health; 2023 Jun; 67(5):663-672. PubMed ID: 36734402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surveillance of occupational risks using job-exposure matrices.
Martin JM; Mouaddib A; Huy-Simon C; Robaux P
Methods Inf Med; 1991 Apr; 30(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 1857249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An occupational mechanical job exposure index based on five Norwegian nationwide surveys of living conditions on work environment.
Hermansen Å
BMC Res Notes; 2024 Mar; 17(1):93. PubMed ID: 38549178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Aggregation of exposure level and probability into a single metric in job-exposure matrices creates bias.
Burstyn I; Lavoué J; Van Tongeren M
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Nov; 56(9):1038-50. PubMed ID: 22986426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
