BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8132804)

  • 1. Audit of deaths from cervical cancer: proposal for an essential component of the National Screening Programme.
    Slater DN; Milner PC; Radley H
    J Clin Pathol; 1994 Jan; 47(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 8132804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multifactorial audit of invasive cervical cancer: key lessons for the National Screening Programme.
    Slater DN
    J Clin Pathol; 1995 May; 48(5):405-7. PubMed ID: 7629283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An audit of cervical cancer deaths in Nottingham.
    Wilson SH; Johnson J
    Cytopathology; 1992; 3(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 1617163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An audit of a cervical smear screening programme.
    Moodie PJ; Kljakovic M; McLeod DK
    N Z Med J; 1989 Jul; 102(872):374-6. PubMed ID: 2797554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cancers diagnosed after negative results on cervical cytology: perspective in the 1980s.
    Mitchell H; Medley G; Giles G
    BMJ; 1990 Jun; 300(6740):1622-6. PubMed ID: 2372641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The agreement between self-reported cervical smear abnormalities and screening programme records.
    Canfell K; Beral V; Green J; Cameron R; Baker K; Brown A
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 16792828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].
    Spaczyński M; Karowicz-Bilinska A; Rokita W; Molińska-Glura M; Januszek-Michalecka L; Seroczyński P; Uchlik J; Nowak-Markwitz E
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Sep; 81(9):655-63. PubMed ID: 20973201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of the women overdue for a smear test in a general practice cervical screening programme.
    Meadows P
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Nov; 37(304):500-3. PubMed ID: 3505643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary results of a district call scheme for cervical screening organised in general practice.
    Havelock CM; Webb J; Queenborough J
    BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6660):1384-6. PubMed ID: 3146374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].
    Spaczyński M; Nowak-Markwitz E; Januszek-Michalecka L; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):833-8. PubMed ID: 20088397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Review of cervical smears from 76 women with invasive cervical cancer: cytological findings and medicolegal implications.
    Coleman DV; Poznansky JJ
    Cytopathology; 2006 Jun; 17(3):127-36. PubMed ID: 16719855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of negative and low-grade cervical smears in women with invasive cervical cancer after the first 3 years of the national cervical screening programme in Slovenia.
    Repše-Fokter A; Pogačnik A; Snoj V; Primic-Žakelj M; Fležar MS
    Cytopathology; 2012 Feb; 23(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 20964743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group.
    Sasieni PD; Cuzick J; Lynch-Farmery E
    Br J Cancer; 1996 Apr; 73(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 8611418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical cytology in the Vale of Trent faculty of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 1985-8.
    Wilson A
    BMJ; 1990 Feb; 300(6721):376-8. PubMed ID: 2106993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the cervical cytology screening programme in an inner city health district.
    Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    BMJ; 1989 Jul; 299(6691):98-100. PubMed ID: 2504348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
    Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Six years' audit of laboratory workload and rates of referral for colposcopy in a cervical screening programme in three districts.
    Raffle AE; Alden B; Mackenzie EF
    BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6757):907-11. PubMed ID: 2261537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical cancer screening and registration--are they working?
    Choyce A; McAvoy BR
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1990 Mar; 44(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 2348149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audit of cervical screening in women with HIV infection in the Auckland and Northland regions of New Zealand.
    Grewal J; Lowe M; Gerrard H; Henley R; Perkins N; Briggs S
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jul; 123(1319):71-8. PubMed ID: 20717179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A smear on audit. Implications of the Leicester cervical smear audit.
    Symonds P; Naftalin N; Shaw P
    BJOG; 2003 Jul; 110(7):646-8. PubMed ID: 12842054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.