157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8132804)
21. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The cervical cancer screening programme in Norway, 1992-2000: changes in Pap smear coverage and incidence of cervical cancer.
Nygård JF; Skare GB; Thoresen SØ
J Med Screen; 2002; 9(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12133929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An examination of the role of opportunistic smear taking in the NHS cervical screening programme using data from the CSEU cervical screening cohort study.
Blanks RG; Moss SM; Coleman DA; Swerdlow AJ
BJOG; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1408-13. PubMed ID: 17803716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk of cervical cancer following negative smears in Maribo County, Denmark, 1966-1982.
Lynge E; Poll P
IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):69-86. PubMed ID: 3570417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Implementing the national invasive cervical cancer audit: a local perspective.
Moss EL; Pearmain P; Askew S; Owen G; Reynolds TM; Prabakar IM; Douce G; Parkes J; Menon V; Todd RW; Redman CW
BJOG; 2010 Oct; 117(11):1411-6. PubMed ID: 20716252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cervical screening in general practice: call and recall.
Ridsdale LL
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Jun; 37(299):257-9. PubMed ID: 3129556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cervical cancer screening in a rural population of Zimbabwe.
Thistle PJ; Chirenje ZM
Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Sep; 43(9):246-51. PubMed ID: 9509642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Negative cytology preceding cervical cancer: causes and prevention.
Robertson JH; Woodend B
J Clin Pathol; 1993 Aug; 46(8):700-2. PubMed ID: 8408692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cervical screening in women over the age of 50: results of a population-based multicentre study.
Flannelly G; Monaghan J; Cruickshank M; Duncan I; Johnson J; Jordan J; Campbell M; Patnick J
BJOG; 2004 Apr; 111(4):362-8. PubMed ID: 15008774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cervical smear histories of Maori women developing invasive cervical cancer.
Ratima K; Paul C; Skegg DC
N Z Med J; 1993 Dec; 106(969):519-21. PubMed ID: 8183492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. False negative rate in cervical cytology.
van der Graaf Y; Vooijs GP
J Clin Pathol; 1987 Apr; 40(4):438-42. PubMed ID: 3584488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The characteristics of false negative cervical smears--implications for the UK cervical cancer screening programme.
Baker RW; O'Sullivan JP; Hanley J; Coleman DV
J Clin Pathol; 1999 May; 52(5):358-62. PubMed ID: 10560356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pap test--with or without vaginal smear?
Milicić-Juhas V; Perić M; Pajtler M; Prvulović I; Curzik D
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 20437636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Health authority cervical screening recall policies and time since last smear: a retrospective cohort analysis in the north west England.
Howe A; Owen-Smith V; Richardson J
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 14746327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Factors affecting uptake of cervical and breast cancer screening among perimenopausal women in Hong Kong.
Chan C; Ho SC; Chan SG; Yip YB; Wong FC; Cheng F
Hong Kong Med J; 2002 Oct; 8(5):334-41. PubMed ID: 12376710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Survey of population coverage in cervical cancer screening in the Oxford region.
Coulter A; Baldwin A
J R Coll Gen Pract; 1987 Oct; 37(303):441-3. PubMed ID: 3505283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A study of the effect of introducing a restrictive cervical screening policy on laboratory workload and cervical cancer detection rates.
Channer JL; Mackenzie EF
Cytopathology; 1990; 1(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 2130995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
