These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

427 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8132899)

  • 1. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):1053-64. PubMed ID: 8132899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception.
    Drullman R; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 May; 95(5 Pt 1):2670-80. PubMed ID: 8207140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. I.
    ter Keurs M; Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2872-80. PubMed ID: 1629480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contribution of consonant landmarks to speech recognition in simulated acoustic-electric hearing.
    Chen F; Loizou PC
    Ear Hear; 2010 Apr; 31(2):259-67. PubMed ID: 20081538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition.
    Boothroyd A; Mulhearn B; Gong J; Ostroff J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Sep; 100(3):1807-18. PubMed ID: 8817914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of temporal smearing on temporal resolution, frequency selectivity, and speech intelligibility.
    Hou Z; Pavlovic CV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Sep; 96(3):1325-40. PubMed ID: 7962999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic predictors of intelligibility for segmentally interrupted speech: temporal envelope, voicing, and duration.
    Fogerty D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Oct; 56(5):1402-8. PubMed ID: 23838986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring consonant identification in nonsense syllables, words, and sentences.
    Woods DL; Yund EW; Herron TJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2010; 47(3):243-60. PubMed ID: 20665350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Importance of envelope modulations during consonants and vowels in segmentally interrupted sentences.
    Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1568-76. PubMed ID: 24606291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech waveform envelope cues for consonant recognition.
    Van Tasell DJ; Soli SD; Kirby VM; Widin GP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct; 82(4):1152-61. PubMed ID: 3680774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perception of temporally processed speech by listeners with hearing impairment.
    Calandruccio L; Doherty KA; Carney LH; Kikkeri HN
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 17609613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Human Frequency Following Responses to Filtered Speech.
    Ananthakrishnan S; Grinstead L; Yurjevich D
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(1):87-105. PubMed ID: 33369591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.
    Fu QJ; Shannon RV
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 12195176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
    Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of Slow- and Fast-Acting Compression on Hearing-Impaired Listeners' Consonant-Vowel Identification in Interrupted Noise.
    Kowalewski B; Zaar J; Fereczkowski M; MacDonald EN; Strelcyk O; May T; Dau T
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518800870. PubMed ID: 30311552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech.
    Qin MK; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):2417-26. PubMed ID: 16642854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.