These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8132907)

  • 1. Detection of unexpected tones with short and long durations.
    Wright BA; Dai H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):931-8. PubMed ID: 8132907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of unexpected tones in gated and continuous maskers.
    Wright BA; Dai H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):939-48. PubMed ID: 8132908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory attentional bandwidth: effect of level and frequency range.
    Botte MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Nov; 98(5 Pt 1):2475-85. PubMed ID: 7593931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Oct; 70(4):1003-14. PubMed ID: 7288037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-frequency auditory filter shape for the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin.
    Lemonds DW; Au WW; Vlachos SA; Nachtigall PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1222-8. PubMed ID: 22894241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of the binaural auditory filter using a detection task.
    Kolarik AJ; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3009-17. PubMed ID: 21117750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers.
    Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Nimmo-Smith I
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 6699291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural notched-noise masking and auditory-filter shape.
    Nitschmann M; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2262-71. PubMed ID: 23556594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The probe-signal method and auditory-filter shape: results from normal- and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Moore BC; Hafter ER; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1996 Jan; 99(1):542-52. PubMed ID: 8568042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method.
    Stone MA; Glasberg BR; Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1992 Dec; 26(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 1292815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A release from masking by continuous, random, notched noise.
    Carlyon RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Feb; 81(2):418-26. PubMed ID: 3558958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reconciling frequency selectivity and phase effects in masking.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1525-38. PubMed ID: 11572363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects.
    Kluk K; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):118-34. PubMed ID: 15276683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency selectivity in macaque monkeys measured using a notched-noise method.
    Burton JA; Dylla ME; Ramachandran R
    Hear Res; 2018 Jan; 357():73-80. PubMed ID: 29223930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Informational masking for multicomponent maskers with spectral gaps.
    Neff DL; Dethlefs TM; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3112-26. PubMed ID: 8300950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Characterising auditory filter nonlinearity.
    Rosen S; Baker RJ
    Hear Res; 1994 Mar; 73(2):231-43. PubMed ID: 8188552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thresholds for tones in maskers of various bandwidths and for signals of various bandwidths as a function of signal frequency.
    Spiegel MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):791-5. PubMed ID: 7240560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking.
    Bacon SP; Repovsch-Duffey JL; Liu L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 12141348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The temporal course of masking and the auditory filter shape.
    Moore BC; Poon PW; Bacon SP; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jun; 81(6):1873-80. PubMed ID: 3611508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.