These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8133392)

  • 1. Surface texture evaluation of glass ionomer restorative materials polished utilizing poly(acrylic acid) gel.
    Liberman R; Geiger S
    J Oral Rehabil; 1994 Jan; 21(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 8133392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface roughness of glass-ceramic insert-composite restorations: assessing several polishing techniques.
    Ashe MJ; Tripp GA; Eichmiller FC; George LA; Meiers JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Oct; 127(10):1495-500. PubMed ID: 8908919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surface roughness evaluation of resin modified glass-ionomers polished utilizing poly(acrylic acid) gel.
    Geiger S; Ravchanukayev M; Liberman R
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Sep; 26(9):704-9. PubMed ID: 10520144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of finishing/polishing time on surface characteristics of tooth-coloured restoratives.
    Yap AU; Sau CW; Lye KW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jun; 25(6):456-61. PubMed ID: 9687119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA; Meiers JC
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems.
    Yap AU; Lye KW; Sau CW
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 9610323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.
    Barnes CM; Covey D; Watanabe H; Simetich B; Schulte JR; Chen H
    J Clin Dent; 2014; 25(4):76-87. PubMed ID: 26054183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.
    Hoelscher DC; Neme AM; Pink FE; Hughes PJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 9610331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of glaze on restorative glass-ionomer cements.
    Hotta M; Hirukawa H; Aono M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Mar; 22(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 7769514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials.
    Hondrum SO; Fernández R
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 9227125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of surface roughness of glass-ionomer cements and compomer.
    Pedrini D; Candido MS; Rodrigues AL
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Jul; 30(7):714-9. PubMed ID: 12791157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surface roughness of composites and hybrid ionomers.
    Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 8957918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Effect of Finishing and Polishing Techniques on the Surface Roughness and the Color of Nanocomposite Resin Restorative Materials.
    Avsar A; Yuzbasioglu E; Sarac D
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2015; 24(5):881-90. PubMed ID: 26768641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mineral loss on adjacent enamel glass ionomer cements restorations after cariogenic and erosive challenges.
    Salas CF; Guglielmi CA; Raggio DP; Mendes FM
    Arch Oral Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(10):1014-9. PubMed ID: 21489401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abrasion resistance of restorative glass-ionomer cements with a light-cured surface coating.
    Hotta M; Hirukawa H
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(2):42-6. PubMed ID: 8008609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Forjanic M; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effectiveness of commonly available surface protecting agents in maintaining microhardness of two cements.
    Fatima N; Ali Abidi SY; Qazi FU; Jat SA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 May; 23(5):315-8. PubMed ID: 23673167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of finishing techniques on marginal adaption and surface morphology of three glass ionomer cements.
    Naguib EA; Carlson TJ
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1992; 71(6):20-2. PubMed ID: 1341697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.