260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8133572)
1. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers.
Marwick C
JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. inquiry on misconduct in discovery of AIDS virus.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():1, 6. PubMed ID: 11646783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal inquiry finds misconduct by a discoverer of the AIDS virus.
Hilts P
N Y Times Web; 1992 Dec; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. American scientist who found H.I.V. is investigated anew.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1992 Mar; ():A1, B9. PubMed ID: 11646925
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
Palca J
Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):297. PubMed ID: 2326642
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Science friction.
Gladwell M
Washington Post; 1992 Dec; ():18-21, 49-51. PubMed ID: 11646256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct charges dropped against AIDS virus scientist.
Hilts PJ
N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():1, 11. PubMed ID: 11647009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Scientific misconduct: new court challenge for OSI.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Apr; 356(6369):466. PubMed ID: 11642987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
Hamilton DP
Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rights to due process in instances of possible scientific misconduct.
Hallum JV; Hadley SW
Endocrinology; 1991 Feb; 128(2):643-4. PubMed ID: 1989853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office--perhaps a new leaf.
Rennie D; Gunsalus CK
JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(7):915-7. PubMed ID: 8426452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An end to fraud?
Nature; 1993 Nov; 366(6451):95-6. PubMed ID: 8232562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientific misconduct. Hearing process proves a challenge for ORI.
Anderson C
Science; 1993 Jun; 260(5115):1714. PubMed ID: 8390094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases?
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.
Pascal CB
Prof Ethics; 1999; 7(1):9-32. PubMed ID: 12569921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
