These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8133572)

  • 21. Neuroscientist accused of misconduct turns on his accusers.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1998 Apr; 392(6675):424. PubMed ID: 9548238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Science and law clash over fraud-case appeals.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1993 Nov; ():B10. PubMed ID: 11647010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. HHS: Gallo guilty of misconduct.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1993 Jan; 259(5092):168-70. PubMed ID: 8380653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dingell rips Healy for 'obstructionism'.
    Cohen J
    Science; 1992 Dec; 258(5089):1729. PubMed ID: 1465608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inquiry finds misconduct by virus researcher; Gallo predicts appeal will overturn finding.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(6):723-4. PubMed ID: 8380877
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
    Needleman HL
    Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. 'Verdicts' are in on the Gallo probe.
    Palca J
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5058):735-8. PubMed ID: 1589751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Misconduct finding in the Gallo case.
    Greenberg D
    Lancet; 1993 Jan; 341(8838):166-7. PubMed ID: 8093759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Legal protections for the scientific misconduct whistleblower.
    Poon P
    J Law Med Ethics; 1995; 23(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 7627310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What to do about scientific misconduct.
    Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dr Baltimore says "sorry".
    Baltimore D
    Nature; 1991 May; 351(6322):94-5. PubMed ID: 2030740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
    Reynolds GH
    Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Champions of science or blacklisting bureaucrats?
    Tokarski C
    J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10116471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Verdict in sight in the "Baltimore case".
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4998):1168-72. PubMed ID: 1900949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. How congressional pressure shaped the 'Baltimore case'.
    Friedly J
    Science; 1996 Aug; 273(5277):873-5. PubMed ID: 8711476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Federal health officials continue to reorganize offices for investigating scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1992 Aug; 268(7):848. PubMed ID: 1640594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.