226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8133824)
1. Selective treatment decisions and the legal rights of very young infants.
Petersen KA
Med J Aust; 1994 Mar; 160(6):377-81. PubMed ID: 8133824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates.
Gostin L
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Passive euthanasia of defective newborn infants: legal considerations.
Robertson JA; Fost N
J Pediatr Surg; 1976 May; 88(5):883-9. PubMed ID: 11662998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics to axes: a response to dilemmas in the nursery.
Diamond JM
New Physician; 1978 Jul; 27(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 10308499
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The case of Baby Jane Doe. 2. Baby Jane Doe in the courts.
Steinbock B
Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Feb; 14(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 6232243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Defective children, their parents, and the death decision.
Nolan-Haley JM
J Leg Med (N Y); 1976 Jan; 4(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 1082475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From the Johns Hopkins Baby to Baby Miller: what have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
Paris JJ; Ferranti J; Reardon F
J Clin Ethics; 2001; 12(3):207-14. PubMed ID: 11789063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Care of critically ill newborns in India. Legal and ethical issues.
Subramanian KN; Paul VK
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):263-75. PubMed ID: 7636406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The legal side. "Do not feed...".
Cushing M
Am J Nurs; 1983 Apr; 83(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 6551143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medico-legal and ethical problems associated with treatment of children born with congenital malformations.
Foo KB
Singapore Med J; 1994 Apr; 35(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 7524162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The ballad of Baby Doe: parental discretion or medical neglect?
Victoroff MS
Prim Care; 1986 Jun; 13(2):271-83. PubMed ID: 2941814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Critically ill newborns and the law. The American experience.
Merrick JC
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):189-209. PubMed ID: 7636402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Murder, she wrote or was it merely selective nontreatment?
Smith GP
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():49-71. PubMed ID: 10118990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Barry RL
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. End-of-life decision before and after birth: changing ethical considerations.
Pinter AB
J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Mar; 43(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 18358277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Care of critically ill newborns. The Israeli experience.
Eidelman AI
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 7636405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Refusing medical treatment: who decides?
Barnes G
Dimens Health Serv; 1982 Nov; 59(11):24-6. PubMed ID: 7141151
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. In the best interests of.
Brody H; Bartholome WG
Hastings Cent Rep; 1988 Dec; 18(6):37-40. PubMed ID: 11644336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Handicapped infants: medical ethics and the law.
Raphael DD
J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 2965246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
