These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8134065)
41. A US population-based study of uterine fibroid diagnosis incidence, trends, and prevalence: 2005 through 2014. Yu O; Scholes D; Schulze-Rath R; Grafton J; Hansen K; Reed SD Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 219(6):591.e1-591.e8. PubMed ID: 30291840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Assessing endometrial cancer risk among US women: long-term trends using hysterectomy-adjusted analysis. Doll KM; Winn AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 221(4):318.e1-318.e9. PubMed ID: 31125544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States. Beavis AL; Gravitt PE; Rositch AF Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 28112816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Prevalence, characteristics, and risk factors of occult uterine cancer in presumed benign hysterectomy. Desai VB; Wright JD; Gross CP; Lin H; Boscoe FP; Hutchison LM; Schwartz PE; Xu X Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 221(1):39.e1-39.e14. PubMed ID: 30853364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Risk estimates of hysterectomy and selected conditions commonly treated with hysterectomy. Merrill RM; Layman AB; Oderda G; Asche C Ann Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 18(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 18280923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy prevalence on rates of cervical, uterine, and ovarian cancer among American Indian and Alaska Native women, 1999-2004. Wong CA; Jim MA; King J; Tom-Orme L; Henderson JA; Saraiya M; Richardson LC; Layne L; Suryaprasad A; Espey DK Cancer Causes Control; 2011 Dec; 22(12):1681-9. PubMed ID: 21984306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Wu JM; Wechter ME; Geller EJ; Nguyen TV; Visco AG Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 110(5):1091-5. PubMed ID: 17978124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Removal of normal ovaries in women under age 51 at the time of hysterectomy. Karp NE; Fenner DE; Burgunder-Zdravkovski L; Morgan DM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):716.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26032038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Associations between Race/Ethnicity, Uterine Fibroids, and Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the VA Healthcare System. Callegari LS; Katon JG; Gray KE; Doll K; Pauk S; Lynch KE; Uchendu US; Zephyrin L; Gardella C Womens Health Issues; 2019; 29(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 30293778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998-2011. Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Mogos MF; Hart S; Salihu HM; Imudia AN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):713.e1-13. PubMed ID: 25935772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Socioeconomic and racial predictors of undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for selected benign diseases: analysis of 341487 hysterectomies. Abenhaim HA; Azziz R; Hu J; Bartolucci A; Tulandi T J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 18262137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reported symptoms before and one year after hysterectomy in African American and white women. Moorman PG; Schildkraut JM; Myers ER; Wang F J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Jul; 20(7):1035-42. PubMed ID: 21671769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation. Multinu F; Casarin J; Hanson KT; Angioni S; Mariani A; Habermann EB; Laughlin-Tommaso SK JAMA Surg; 2018 Jun; 153(6):e180141. PubMed ID: 29641835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hysterectomies in Portugal (2000-2014): What has changed? Gante I; Medeiros-Borges C; Águas F Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Jan; 208():97-102. PubMed ID: 27914240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Racial and ethnic disparities in benign gynecologic conditions and associated surgeries. Jacoby VL; Fujimoto VY; Giudice LC; Kuppermann M; Washington AE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 202(6):514-21. PubMed ID: 20430357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Nationwide trends in the utilization of and payments for hysterectomy in the United States among commercially insured women. Morgan DM; Kamdar NS; Swenson CW; Kobernik EK; Sammarco AG; Nallamothu B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):425.e1-425.e18. PubMed ID: 29288067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Surgical Trends and Time Frame Comparison of Surgical Types of Hysterectomy: A Nationwide, Population-based 15-year Study. Huang CC; Lo TS; Huang YT; Long CY; Law KS; Wu MP J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):65-73.e1. PubMed ID: 30928611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Patient and Hospital Characteristics Associated with Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: Evidence from 143 Illinois Hospitals, 2016 to 2018. Traylor J; Simon M; Tsai S; Feinglass J J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1337-1343. PubMed ID: 32126301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Usefulness of prior hysterectomy as an independent predictor of Framingham risk score (The Women's Health Initiative). Hsia J; Barad D; Margolis K; Rodabough R; McGovern PG; Limacher MC; Oberman A; Smoller S; Am J Cardiol; 2003 Aug; 92(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 12888128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of characteristics of fibroids in African American and white women undergoing premenopausal hysterectomy. Moorman PG; Leppert P; Myers ER; Wang F Fertil Steril; 2013 Mar; 99(3):768-776.e1. PubMed ID: 23199610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]