These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8134065)

  • 61. Trends in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Techniques for Nonmalignant Conditions in a Defined Population.
    Hansdottir K; Gudmundsson JA
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(2):198-202. PubMed ID: 28848157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Relationship between hysterectomy and admixture in African American women.
    Qi L; Nassir R; Kosoy R; Garcia L; Waetjen LE; Ochs-Balcom HM; Gass M; Robbins J; Seldin MF
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Apr; 208(4):279.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23333549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. A qualitative study of women's hysterectomy experience.
    Williams RD; Clark AJ
    J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 2000; 9 Suppl 2():S15-25. PubMed ID: 10714742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Black Women Are More Likely Than White Women to Schedule a Uterine-Sparing Treatment for Leiomyomas.
    Wegienka G; Stewart EA; Nicholson WK; Zhang S; Li F; Thomas L; Spies JB; Venable S; Laughlin-Tommaso S; Diamond MP; Anchan RM; Maxwell GL; Marsh EE; Myers ER; Vines AI; Wise LA; Wallace K; Jacoby VL
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2021 Mar; 30(3):355-366. PubMed ID: 33524308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Does Universal Insurance Mitigate Racial Differences in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy?
    Ranjit A; Sharma M; Romano A; Jiang W; Staat B; Koehlmoos T; Haider AH; Little SE; Witkop CT; Robinson JN; Cohen SL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):790-796. PubMed ID: 28351763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Ethnic differences in past hysterectomy for benign conditions.
    Powell LH; Meyer P; Weiss G; Matthews KA; Santoro N; Randolph JF; Schocken M; Skurnick J; Ory MG; Sutton-Tyrrell K
    Womens Health Issues; 2005; 15(4):179-86. PubMed ID: 16051109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications.
    Kovac SR
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 95(6 Pt 1):787-93. PubMed ID: 10831967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Breast cancer risk associated with gynecologic surgery and indications for such surgery.
    Schairer C; Persson I; Falkeborn M; Naessen T; Troisi R; Brinton LA
    Int J Cancer; 1997 Jan; 70(2):150-4. PubMed ID: 9009152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Histopathological analysis of hysterectomy specimens.
    Jha R; Pant AD; Jha A; Adhikari RC; Sayami G
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006; 45(163):283-90. PubMed ID: 17334416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Impact of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy on race-specific rates of corpus, cervical, and ovarian cancers in the United States.
    Merrill RM
    Ann Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 16(12):880-7. PubMed ID: 17027290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends.
    Sizzi O; Paparella P; Bonito C; Paparella R; Rossetti A
    JSLS; 2004; 8(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 15554277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Leiomyomas in an African Caribbean hysterectomy population considered to be ethnically related to African Americans.
    Kadhel P; Borja de Mozota D; Simon P; Toto T; Jermidi C; Ayhan G
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Feb; 49(2):101654. PubMed ID: 31760183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Hysterectomy trends in Australia--between 2000/01 and 2004/05.
    Hill EL; Graham ML; Shelley JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Apr; 50(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 20522072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.
    Wright JD; Herzog TJ; Tsui J; Ananth CV; Lewin SN; Lu YS; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Aug; 122(2 Pt 1):233-241. PubMed ID: 23969789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands.
    Hanstede MM; Burger MJ; Timmermans A; Burger MP
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Feb; 91(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 22043840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Nationwide rates of conversion from laparoscopic or vaginal hysterectomy to open abdominal hysterectomy in Germany.
    Stang A; Merrill RM; Kuss O
    Eur J Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 26(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 21240542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Patterns of black and white hysterectomy incidence among reproductive aged women.
    Gartner DR; Delamater PL; Hummer RA; Lund JL; Pence BW; Robinson WR
    Health Serv Res; 2021 Oct; 56(5):847-853. PubMed ID: 33615466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Regional variation of hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases in Switzerland.
    Stoller N; Wertli MM; Zaugg TM; Haynes AG; Chiolero A; Rodondi N; Panczak R; Aujesky D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233082. PubMed ID: 32407404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.
    Ross WT; Meister MR; Shepherd JP; Olsen MA; Lowder JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):436.e1-436.e8. PubMed ID: 28716634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.