These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8134248)

  • 1. Hemispheric differences in the interference among components of compound gratings.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Conesa J
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Dec; 54(6):785-93. PubMed ID: 8134248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric asymmetries in global/local processing are modulated by perceptual salience.
    Fink GR; Marshall JC; Halligan PW; Dolan RJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jan; 37(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 9920469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemispheric differences for visual matrix processing: stimulus size and spatial frequency effects.
    Pedersen HK; Polich J
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):525-38. PubMed ID: 11748906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymmetries in the covert orienting of visual spatial attention to spatial and non-spatial cues in Alzheimer's disease.
    Maruff P; Malone V; Currie J
    Brain; 1995 Dec; 118 ( Pt 6)():1421-35. PubMed ID: 8595474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical perception of orientation in infants and adults.
    Franklin A; Catherwood D; Alvarez J; Axelsson E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 20519136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lateralization of spatial rather than temporal attention underlies the left hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Asanowicz D; Kruse L; Śmigasiewicz K; Verleger R
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Nov; 118():54-62. PubMed ID: 28797898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings.
    Kitterle FL; Selig LM
    Percept Psychophys; 1991 Jul; 50(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 1881762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On spatial frequencies and cerebral hemispheres: some remarks from the electrophysiological and neuropsychological points of view.
    Mecacci L
    Brain Cogn; 1993 Jul; 22(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 8373573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations in the absence of low spatial frequencies.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Feb; 14(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 11970792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.
    Kitterle FL; Christman S; Hellige JB
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Oct; 48(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 2243753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Different magnitude representations in left and right hemisphere: evidence from the visual half field technique.
    Notebaert K; Reynvoet B
    Laterality; 2009 May; 14(3):228-45. PubMed ID: 18792837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hemispheric differences in the rates of information processing for simple non-verbal stimuli.
    Nicholls ME; Cooper CJ
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(7):677-84. PubMed ID: 1944869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stronger interference from distractors in the right hemifield during visual search.
    Carlei C; Kerzel D
    Laterality; 2018 Mar; 23(2):152-165. PubMed ID: 28502226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Words, hemispheres, and dissociable subsystems: the effects of exposure duration, case alternation, priming, and continuity of form on word recognition in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis AW; Ansorge L; Lavidor M
    Brain Lang; 2007 Dec; 103(3):292-303. PubMed ID: 17292463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial distribution of attention and inter-hemispheric competition.
    Yamaoka K; Michimata C
    Cogn Process; 2015 Nov; 16(4):417-25. PubMed ID: 26289477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual field asymmetries and allocation of attention in visual scenes.
    Rhodes DL; Robertson LC
    Brain Cogn; 2002 Oct; 50(1):95-115. PubMed ID: 12372355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facilitative orthographic neighborhood effects: the SERIOL model account.
    Whitney C; Lavidor M
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Nov; 51(3):179-213. PubMed ID: 16153629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing.
    Peyrin C; Mermillod M; Chokron S; Marendaz C
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Dec; 62(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 16837115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.