These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8134277)

  • 1. Computer-aided socket design for trans-femoral amputees.
    Travis RP; Dewar ME
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 8134277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets: a comparison between CAD CAM and conventionally produced sockets.
    Oberg T; Lilja M; Johansson T; Karsznia A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1993 Dec; 17(3):164-71. PubMed ID: 8134276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of a quantitative method for defining CAD/CAM socket modifications.
    Lemaire ED; Bexiga P; Johnson F; Solomonidis SE; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 10355641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Case study: survey of patient satisfaction with prosthesis quality and design among below-knee prosthetic leg socket users.
    Mohd Hawari N; Jawaid M; Md Tahir P; Azmeer RA
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2017 Nov; 12(8):868-874. PubMed ID: 28068847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of the pilot phase of a clinical evaluation of computer aided design of trans-tibial prosthesis sockets.
    Holden JM; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1986 Dec; 10(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 3808920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CAD/CAM evaluation of the fit of trans-tibial sockets for trans-tibial amputation stumps.
    Isozaki K; Hosoda M; Masuda T; Morita S
    J Med Dent Sci; 2006 Mar; 53(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 16722145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influences and trends of various shape-capture methods on outcomes in trans-tibial prosthetics: A systematic review.
    Suyi Yang E; Aslani N; McGarry A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):540-555. PubMed ID: 31364475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weight bearing and velocity in trans-tibial and trans-femoral amputees.
    Jones ME; Bashford GM; Mann JM
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 9453090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided design and manufacture of an above-knee amputee socket.
    Torres-Moreno R; Saunders CG; Foort J; Morrison JB
    J Biomed Eng; 1991 Jan; 13(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 2002669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An evaluation of computer aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Topper AK; Fernie GR
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1990 Dec; 14(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 2128892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-socket manufacturing error: how much before it is clinically apparent?
    Sanders JE; Severance MR; Allyn KJ
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(4):567-82. PubMed ID: 22773260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A smartphone photogrammetry method for digitizing prosthetic socket interiors.
    Hernandez A; Lemaire E
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Apr; 41(2):210-214. PubMed ID: 27613588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The AirCirc: design and development of a thermal management prototype device for below-knee prosthesis leg socket.
    Nurhanisah MH; Jawaid M; Ahmad Azmeer R; Paridah MT
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2019 Jul; 14(5):513-520. PubMed ID: 29933703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A CAD CAM method for custom below-knee sockets.
    Engsberg JR; Clynch GS; Lee AG; Allan JS; Harder JA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1992 Dec; 16(3):183-8. PubMed ID: 1491952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Automated fabrication of mobility aids (AFMA): below-knee CASD/CAM testing and evaluation program results.
    Houston VL; Burgess EM; Childress DS; Lehneis HR; Mason CP; Garbarini MA; LaBlanc KP; Boone DA; Chan RB; Harlan JH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(4):78-124. PubMed ID: 1432729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations.
    Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consistency, precision, and accuracy of optical and electromagnetic shape-capturing systems for digital measurement of residual-limb anthropometrics of persons with transtibial amputation.
    Geil MD
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2007; 44(4):515-24. PubMed ID: 18247248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical field-testing of ATLAS prosthetic system for trans-tibial amputees.
    Jensen JS; Raab W
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Aug; 26(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 12227454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Successful prosthetic fitting of elderly trans-femoral amputees with Intelligent Prosthesis (IP): a clinical pilot study.
    Chin T; Maeda Y; Sawamura S; Oyabu H; Nagakura Y; Takase I; Machida K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Sep; 31(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 17979012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An open socket technique for through-knee amputations in relation to skin problems of the stump: an explorative study.
    Otter N; Postema K; Rijken RA; van Limbeek J
    Clin Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 13(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 10327095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.