These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8134278)

  • 21. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot.
    Lehmann JF; Price R; Boswell-Bessette S; Dralle A; Questad K
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Aug; 74(8):853-61. PubMed ID: 8347071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Finite element modelling of an energy-storing prosthetic foot during the stance phase of transtibial amputee gait.
    Bonnet X; Pillet H; Fodé P; Lavaste F; Skalli W
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Jan; 226(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 22888587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Biomechanical evaluation of SACH and uniaxial feet.
    Goh JC; Solomonidis SE; Spence WD; Paul JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1984 Dec; 8(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 6522257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparative study of conventional and energy-storing prosthetic feet in high-functioning transfemoral amputees.
    Graham LE; Datta D; Heller B; Howitt J; Pros D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 88(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 17532907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prosthetic forefoot and heel stiffness across consecutive foot stiffness categories and sizes.
    Turner AT; Halsne EG; Caputo JM; Curran CS; Hansen AH; Hafner BJ; Morgenroth DC
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(5):e0268136. PubMed ID: 35536854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stiffness and energy storage characteristics of energy storage and return prosthetic feet.
    Womac ND; Neptune RR; Klute GK
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Jun; 43(3):266-275. PubMed ID: 30688551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Below-knee amputee gait in stair ambulation. A comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet.
    Torburn L; Schweiger GP; Perry J; Powers CM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1994 Jun; (303):185-92. PubMed ID: 8194232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Static load response of the heels of SACH feet.
    Skinner HB; Abrahamson MA; Hung RK; Wilson LA; Effeney DJ
    Orthopedics; 1985 Feb; 8(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 4094971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Finite element analysis as a tool for parametric prosthetic foot design and evaluation. Technique development in the solid ankle cushioned heel (SACH) foot.
    Saunders MM; Schwentker EP; Kay DB; Bennett G; Jacobs CR; Verstraete MC; Njus GO
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Feb; 6(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 12623440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dynamic testing of below-knee prosthesis: assembly and components.
    Wevers HW; Durance JP
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1987 Dec; 11(3):117-23. PubMed ID: 3438155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Development of inexpensive prosthetic feet for high-heeled shoes using simple shoe insole model.
    Meier MR; Tucker KA; Hansen AH
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2014; 51(3):439-50. PubMed ID: 25019666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An iterative method for viscoelastic modeling of prosthetic feet.
    Geil MD
    J Biomech; 2002 Oct; 35(10):1405-10. PubMed ID: 12231286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: a randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing.
    Raschke SU; Orendurff MS; Mattie JL; Kenyon DE; Jones OY; Moe D; Winder L; Wong AS; Moreno-Hernández A; Highsmith MJ; J Sanderson D; Kobayashi T
    J Biomech; 2015 Jan; 48(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 25480541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bioenergetic comparison of a new energy-storing foot and SACH foot in traumatic below-knee vascular amputations.
    Casillas JM; Dulieu V; Cohen M; Marcer I; Didier JP
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1995 Jan; 76(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 7811172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot.
    Lehmann JF; Price R; Boswell-Bessette S; Dralle A; Questad K; deLateur BJ
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Nov; 74(11):1225-31. PubMed ID: 8239969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Outdoor dynamic subject-specific evaluation of internal stresses in the residual limb: hydraulic energy-stored prosthetic foot compared to conventional energy-stored prosthetic feet.
    Portnoy S; Kristal A; Gefen A; Siev-Ner I
    Gait Posture; 2012 Jan; 35(1):121-5. PubMed ID: 21955382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of transverse rotation angle on compression and effective lever arm of prosthetic feet during simulated stance.
    Major MJ; Howard D; Jones R; Twiste M
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2012 Jun; 36(2):231-5. PubMed ID: 22389423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet.
    Curtze C; Hof AL; van Keeken HG; Halbertsma JP; Postema K; Otten B
    J Biomech; 2009 Aug; 42(11):1746-53. PubMed ID: 19446814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of gait between young adults fitted with the space foot and nondisabled persons.
    Prince F; Allard P; McFadyen BJ; Aissaoui R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1993 Dec; 74(12):1369-76. PubMed ID: 8259907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Energy expenditure during ambulation in dysvascular and traumatic below-knee amputees: a comparison of five prosthetic feet.
    Torburn L; Powers CM; Guiterrez R; Perry J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1995 May; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 7562650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.