These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8134492)

  • 1. Assessment of the abdominal wall after pedicled TRAM flap surgery: 5- to 7-year follow-up of 150 consecutive patients.
    Mizgala CL; Hartrampf CR; Bennett GK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1994 Apr; 93(5):988-1002; discussion 1003-4. PubMed ID: 8134492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abdominal-wall recovery following TRAM flap: a functional outcome study.
    Kind GM; Rademaker AW; Mustoe TA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Feb; 99(2):417-28. PubMed ID: 9030149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction.
    Agarwal JP; Gottlieb LJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Apr; 58(4):359-63. PubMed ID: 17413875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal sequelae after pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
    Petit JY; Rietjens M; Ferreira MA; Montrucoli D; Lifrange E; Martinelli P
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Mar; 99(3):723-9. PubMed ID: 9047192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Functional evaluation of the abdominal wall after raising a rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap].
    Fitoussi A; Le Taillandier M; Biffaud JC; Selinger R; Clough KB
    Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1997 Apr; 42(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 9768148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound imaging evaluation of abdominal muscles after breast reconstruction with a unilateral pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap.
    Liaw LJ; Lin SD; Guo LY; Hou YY; Hou MF; Hsu AT
    Phys Ther; 2013 Mar; 93(3):356-68. PubMed ID: 23064735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mesh assisted direct closure of bilateral TRAM flap donor sites.
    Paterson P; Sterne GD; Fatah F
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2006; 59(4):347-51. PubMed ID: 16756248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The fate of the oblique abdominal muscles after free TRAM flap surgery.
    Blondeel N; Boeckx WD; Vanderstraeten GG; Lysens R; Van Landuyt K; Tonnard P; Monstrey SJ; Matton G
    Br J Plast Surg; 1997 Jul; 50(5):315-21. PubMed ID: 9245864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of unipedicled and bipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions: assessment of physical function and patient satisfaction.
    Simon AM; Bouwense CL; McMillan S; Lamb S; Hammond DC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jan; 113(1):136-40. PubMed ID: 14707631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.
    Serletti JM; Moran SL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Nov; 100(6):1418-24; discussion 1425-7. PubMed ID: 9385952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
    Chevray PM
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of regenerative human acellular tissue (AlloDerm) to reconstruct the abdominal wall following pedicle TRAM flap breast reconstruction surgery.
    Glasberg SB; D'Amico RA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 Jul; 118(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 16816665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal function after pedicled TRAM flap surgery.
    Mizgala CL; Hartrampf CR; Bennett GK
    Clin Plast Surg; 1994 Apr; 21(2):255-72. PubMed ID: 8187419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of synthetic mesh for the entire abdominal wall after TRAM flap transfer.
    Moscona RA; Ramon Y; Toledano H; Barzilay G
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Mar; 101(3):706-10; discussion 711-2. PubMed ID: 9500387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Donor-site morbidity after pedicled TRAM breast reconstruction: a comparison of two different types of mesh.
    Sværdborg M; Damsgaard TE
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(5):476-80. PubMed ID: 23392261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contour abnormalities of the abdomen after breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: the role of muscle preservation.
    Nahabedian MY; Dooley W; Singh N; Manson PN
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jan; 109(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 11786798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimizing donor-site morbidity following bilateral pedicled TRAM breast reconstruction with the double mesh fold over technique.
    Bharti G; Groves L; Sanger C; Thompson J; David L; Marks M
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 May; 70(5):484-7. PubMed ID: 23542860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
    Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of abdominal wall strength after TRAM flap surgery.
    Dulin WA; Avila RA; Verheyden CN; Grossman L
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 May; 113(6):1662-5; discussion 1666-7. PubMed ID: 15114126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Donor-site morbidity after pedicled or free TRAM flap surgery: a prospective and objective study.
    Edsander-Nord A; Jurell G; Wickman M
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Oct; 102(5):1508-16. PubMed ID: 9774004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.