These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8134664)
1. [Experience in mass screening of breast cancer with mammography in France]. Mamelle N; Lacour A; Anes A; Bazin B; Chaperon J; Duru G; Piette C; San Marco JL; Schaffer P; Arnold F Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1994; 42(1):34-49. PubMed ID: 8134664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Economic evaluation of the new national breast cancer screening programme in France: application to the Bouche-du-Rhone district]. Giorgi R; Reynaud J; Wait S; Seradour B Bull Cancer; 2005 Nov; 92(11):995-1001. PubMed ID: 16316834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mass screening programs for breast cancer in France--average values of assessment criteria. Lacour A; Mamelle N; Arnold F; Bazin B; Bohec C; Brégeault A; Chaperon J; Dubuc M; Duru G; Exbrayat C; Fontaine D; Manuel C; Obadia Y; Piette C; San Marco JL; Schaffer P; Trugeon A; Allemand H Cancer Detect Prev; 1997; 21(3):221-30. PubMed ID: 9167039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group. Lynge E APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study. Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Using medical imaging for a comprehensive breast cancer screening program]. Dilhuydy MH Bull Cancer; 2009 Nov; 96(11):1071-86. PubMed ID: 19887333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Evaluation of individual breast cancer screening in the Alpes-Maritimes]. Fontas P; Bregeault A; Maestro C; Namer M; Obadia Y; Rotily M J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 77(9):657-62. PubMed ID: 8944122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The British Columbia Mammography Screening Program: evaluation of the first 15 months. Burhenne LJ; Hislop TG; Burhenne HJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Jan; 158(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 1307850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of mass screening for breast cancer in the Somme district (France) between 1990 and 1996]. Ganry O; Peng J; Dubreuil A Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Sep; 47(4):335-41. PubMed ID: 10519174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium]. Grivegnée AR; Autier P Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [French screening program of breast cancer. Results from 5 districts (1989-1994)]. Séradour B; Allemand H; Schaffer P Bull Cancer; 1997 Aug; 84(8):822-8. PubMed ID: 9339188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Practice of large scale mammography in the Ariana area of Tunisia: prelude to a mass screening?]. Bouchlaka A; Ben Abdallah M; Ben Aissa R; Smida S; Ouechtati A; Boussen H; Gueddana N Tunis Med; 2009 Jul; 87(7):426-31. PubMed ID: 20063674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The role of cancer registries in the evaluation of breast cancer screening]. Schaffer P; Renaud R; Gairard B; Guldenfels C Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1996; 44 Suppl 1():S15-21. PubMed ID: 8935860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing and testing a cost-assessment tool for cancer screening programs. Subramanian S; Ekwueme DU; Gardner JG; Trogdon J Am J Prev Med; 2009 Sep; 37(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 19666160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Screening mammography in British Columbia]. Burhenne LJ; Burhenne HJ; Kan L Rontgenpraxis; 1993 Dec; 46(12):367-70. PubMed ID: 8303468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recruitment of underserved women for breast cancer detection programs. Zabora JR; Morrison C; Olsen SJ; Ashley B Cancer Pract; 1997; 5(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 9341352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Breast cancer screening. Objectives of a professional structure]. Taïeb A Bull Acad Natl Med; 1998; 182(8):1669-72. PubMed ID: 10188313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A screening mammography program. Staying alive and making it work. Monsees BS; Destouet JM Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):211-9. PubMed ID: 1732928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India. Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program. Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]