These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8135177)
21. Complete embedding and close step-sectioning of radical prostatectomy specimens both increase detection of extra-prostatic extension, and correlate with increased disease-free survival by stage of prostate cancer patients. Desai A; Wu H; Sun L; Sesterhenn IA; Mostofi FK; McLeod D; Amling C; Kusuda L; Lance R; Herring J; Foley J; Baldwin D; Bishoff JT; Soderdahl D; Moul JW Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002; 5(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 12496984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Complete histologic serial sectioning of a prostate gland with adenocarcinoma. Humphrey PA Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 May; 17(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 8470761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Importance of margin extent as a predictor of outcome after adjuvant radiotherapy for Gleason score 7 pT3N0 prostate cancer. Valicenti RK; Chervoneva I; Gomella LG Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Mar; 58(4):1093-7. PubMed ID: 15001249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of ultrasound-guided biopsies and prostatectomy specimens: predictive accuracy of Gleason score and tumor site. Gregori A; Vieweg J; Dahm P; Paulson DF Urol Int; 2001; 66(2):66-71. PubMed ID: 11223746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Blind Biobanking of the Prostatectomy Specimen: Critical Evaluation of the Existing Techniques and Development of the New 4-Level Tissue Extraction Model With High Sampling Efficacy. Tolkach Y; Eminaga O; Wötzel F; Huss S; Bettendorf O; Eltze E; Abbas M; Imkamp F; Semjonow A Prostate; 2017 Mar; 77(4):396-405. PubMed ID: 27862105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis. Cupp MR; Bostwick DG; Myers RP; Oesterling JE J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer. Eichelberger LE; Koch MO; Daggy JK; Ulbright TM; Eble JN; Cheng L Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Sep; 120(3):386-91. PubMed ID: 14502802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma. Sehdev AE; Pan CC; Epstein JI Hum Pathol; 2001 May; 32(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 11381367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ceramic foam plates: a new tool for processing fresh radical prostatectomy specimens. Vlajnic T; Oeggerli M; Rentsch C; Püschel H; Zellweger T; Thalmann GN; Ruiz C; Bubendorf L Virchows Arch; 2014 Dec; 465(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 25323812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimal carcinoma in prostate needle biopsy specimens: diagnostic features and radical prostatectomy follow-up. Thorson P; Vollmer RT; Arcangeli C; Keetch DW; Humphrey PA Mod Pathol; 1998 Jun; 11(6):543-51. PubMed ID: 9647592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of capsular perforation and seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer. Bostwick DG; Qian J; Bergstralh E; Dundore P; Dugan J; Myers RP; Oesterling JE J Urol; 1996 Apr; 155(4):1361-7. PubMed ID: 8632575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pathological parameters of radical prostatectomy for clinical stages T1c versus T2 prostate adenocarcinoma: decreased pathological stage and increased detection of transition zone tumors. Jack GS; Cookson MS; Coffey CS; Vader V; Roberts RL; Chang SS; Smith JA; Shappell SB J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):519-24. PubMed ID: 12131301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of digital rectal examination and biopsy results with the radical prostatectomy specimen. Obek C; Louis P; Civantos F; Soloway MS J Urol; 1999 Feb; 161(2):494-8; discussion 498-9. PubMed ID: 9915434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-benefit analysis of using large-format histology sections in routine diagnostic breast care. Tot T Breast; 2010 Aug; 19(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 20382020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy. Cheng L; Koch MO; Juliar BE; Daggy JK; Foster RS; Bihrle R; Gardner TA J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(13):2911-7. PubMed ID: 15860849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling. Samaratunga H; Montironi R; True L; Epstein JI; Griffiths DF; Humphrey PA; van der Kwast T; Wheeler TM; Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Mod Pathol; 2011 Jan; 24(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 20834234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading? Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The percentage of prostate needle biopsy cores with carcinoma from the more involved side of the biopsy as a predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) database. Freedland SJ; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Dorey F; Presti JC Cancer; 2003 Dec; 98(11):2344-50. PubMed ID: 14635068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Incidence and location of prostate and urothelial carcinoma in prostates from cystoprostatectomies: implications for possible apical sparing surgery. Revelo MP; Cookson MS; Chang SS; Shook MF; Smith JA; Shappell SB J Urol; 2004 Feb; 171(2 Pt 1):646-51. PubMed ID: 14713778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]