These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8135208)

  • 1. Profile enhancement and cephalometric landmark identification.
    Burger HJ; Rossouw PE; Stander I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Mar; 105(3):250-6. PubMed ID: 8135208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Chang HF; Chen KC
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Oct; 70(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 11036999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability of landmark identification on monitor-displayed lateral cephalometric images.
    Yu SH; Nahm DS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):790.e1-6; discussion e1. PubMed ID: 18538235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry.
    Plooij JM; Swennen GR; Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Schutyser FA; Bronkhorst EM; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Bergé SJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 19167191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the reproducibility of landmark identification using scanned cephalometric images.
    Turner PJ; Weerakone S
    J Orthod; 2001 Sep; 28(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 11504900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of image quality on the identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    McWilliam JS; Welander U
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Jan; 48(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 272131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks: an experimental study on skulls.
    Hägg U; Cooke MS; Chan TC; Tng TT; Lau PY
    Aust Orthod J; 1998 Oct; 15(3):177-85. PubMed ID: 10204427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification.
    Held CL; Ferguson DJ; Gallo MW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 May; 119(5):472-81. PubMed ID: 11343018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Inter- and intra-observer identification of landmarks used in the Delaire analysis.
    Haynes S; Chau MN
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 15(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8436201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is there consistency in cephalometric landmark identification amongst oral and maxillofacial surgeons?
    Miloro M; Borba AM; Ribeiro-Junior O; Naclério-Homem MG; Jungner M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 43(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 24055177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exposure reduction in cephalography with a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system.
    Seki K; Okano T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):127-30. PubMed ID: 8299830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reproducibility of facial soft tissue landmarks on facial images captured on a 3D camera.
    Othman SA; Ahmad R; Mericant AF; Jamaludin M
    Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 23785939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Soft tissue cephalometrics: an overdue evaluation.
    Seliem EN; Attia KH; Al-Hadithiy S; Mostafa YA
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 20072746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of lead thyroid collars on cephalometric landmark identification.
    Wiechmann D; Decker A; Hohoff A; Kleinheinz J; Stamm T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Oct; 104(4):560-8. PubMed ID: 17218125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The validity of the prediction of Soft Tissue profile changes after LeFort I osteotomy using the dentofacial planner (computer software).
    Konstiantos KA; O'Reilly MT; Close J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Mar; 105(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 8135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Landmark identification errors on cone-beam computed tomography-derived cephalograms and conventional digital cephalograms.
    Chang ZC; Hu FC; Lai E; Yao CC; Chen MH; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Dec; 140(6):e289-97. PubMed ID: 22133963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A proposal for soft tissue landmarks for craniofacial analysis using 3-dimensional laser scan imaging.
    Baik HS; Lee HJ; Lee KJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 16548301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.