These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

320 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8135452)

  • 1. Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests.
    Irwig L; Tosteson AN; Gatsonis C; Lau J; Colditz G; Chalmers TC; Mosteller F
    Ann Intern Med; 1994 Apr; 120(8):667-76. PubMed ID: 8135452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Guidelines for diagnostic tests and diagnostic accuracy in surgical research.
    Jones CM; Ashrafian H; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    J Invest Surg; 2010 Feb; 23(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 20233006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Leeflang MM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2014 Feb; 20(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 24274632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analyses of studies of the diagnostic accuracy of laboratory tests: a review of the concepts and methods.
    Vamvakas EC
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Aug; 122(8):675-86. PubMed ID: 9701328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-epidemiologic study showed frequent time trends in summary estimates from meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Cohen JF; Korevaar DA; Wang J; Leeflang MM; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 77():60-67. PubMed ID: 27212137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of simple pooling and bivariate model used in meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy published in Chinese journals].
    Huang YS; Yang ZR; Zhan SY
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Jun; 47(3):483-8. PubMed ID: 26080880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy could not be reproduced.
    Stegeman I; Leeflang MMG
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Nov; 127():161-166. PubMed ID: 32679314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Manchikanti L; Derby R; Wolfer L; Singh V; Datta S; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(6):929-63. PubMed ID: 19935980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating meta-analyses in the general surgical literature: a critical appraisal.
    Dixon E; Hameed M; Sutherland F; Cook DJ; Doig C
    Ann Surg; 2005 Mar; 241(3):450-9. PubMed ID: 15729067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Survey revealed a lack of clarity about recommended methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy data.
    Ochodo EA; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 66(11):1281-8. PubMed ID: 23998917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing variability in results in systematic reviews of diagnostic studies.
    Naaktgeboren CA; Ochodo EA; Van Enst WA; de Groot JAH; Hooft L; Leeflang MMG; Bossuyt PM; Moons KGM; Reitsma JB
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jan; 16():6. PubMed ID: 26772804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative reviews of diagnostic test accuracy in imaging research: evaluation of current practices.
    Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; Leeflang M; Treanor L; Kraaijpoel N; Salameh JP; Alabousi M; Asraoui N; Choo-Foo J; Takwoingi Y; Deeks JJ; McInnes MDF
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5386-5394. PubMed ID: 30899976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A toxicologist's guide to studying diagnostic tests.
    Bailey B; Amre DK
    Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2005; 43(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 15902791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests must take into account the use of surrogate standards.
    Kang J; Brant R; Ghali WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 May; 66(5):566-574.e1. PubMed ID: 23466018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survey of the methods and reporting practices in published meta-analyses of test performance: 1987 to 2009.
    Dahabreh IJ; Chung M; Kitsios GD; Terasawa T; Raman G; Tatsioni A; Tobar A; Lau J; Trikalinos TA; Schmid CH
    Res Synth Methods; 2013 Sep; 4(3):242-55. PubMed ID: 26053844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests.
    Lijmer JG; Bossuyt PM; Heisterkamp SH
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1525-37. PubMed ID: 12111918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.
    van Enst WA; Scholten RJ; Whiting P; Zwinderman AH; Hooft L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Nov; 67(11):1192-9. PubMed ID: 24996667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating Diagnostic Test Accuracy: A Practical Review for Clinical Researchers-Part I. General Guidance and Tips.
    Kim KW; Lee J; Choi SH; Huh J; Park SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(6):1175-87. PubMed ID: 26576106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An overview of meta-analyses of diagnostic tests in infectious diseases.
    Cruciani M; Mengoli C
    Infect Dis Clin North Am; 2009 Jun; 23(2):225-67, Table of Contents. PubMed ID: 19393907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
    Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bruns DE; Gatsonis CA; Glasziou PP; Irwig LM; Lijmer JG; Moher D; Rennie D; de Vet HC;
    Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 21(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 14760036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.