67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8136386)
1. [The parameters of image quality of a novel ultra high resolution film-screen system].
Beutel J; Mickewich DJ; Issler SL; Shaw R
Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 8136386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the imaging characteristics of the new Kodak Hyper Speed G film with the current T-MAT G/RA film and the CR 9000 system.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(19):4541-52. PubMed ID: 16177488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Image quality parameters of film-screen systems].
Hoeschen D
Rontgenblatter; 1987 Jun; 40(6):193-9. PubMed ID: 3616429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel epitaxially grown LSO-based thin-film scintillator for micro-imaging using hard synchrotron radiation.
Douissard PA; Cecilia A; Martin T; Chevalier V; Couchaud M; Baumbach T; Dupré K; Kühbacher M; Rack A
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2010 Sep; 17(5):571-83. PubMed ID: 20724778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of film-screen combinations with contrast detail diagram and interactive image analysis. 2: Linear assessment of grey scale ranges with interactive image analysis].
Stamm G; Eichbaum G; Hagemann G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Sep; 7(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 9410005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the performance of modern screen-film and digital mammography systems.
Monnin P; Gutierrez D; Bulling S; Lepori D; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2617-31. PubMed ID: 15901958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
Hagemann G; Eichbaum G; Stamm G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
Liaparinos PF; Kandarakis IS
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The evaluation of the performance of a new-concept screen-film system].
Tosi G; Brambilla MG; De Crescenzo S
Radiol Med; 1992 Nov; 84(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 1475429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imaging characteristics of different mammographic screens.
Kuhn H; Knüpfer W
Med Phys; 1992; 19(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 1584145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hologic's Flat-Panel Detector].
Ogata Y; Matsumoto M; Suekane K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):264-75. PubMed ID: 12766272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurement of the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of digital X-ray detectors according to the novel standard IEC 62220-1.
Illers H; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):39-44. PubMed ID: 15933079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of radiographic screen-film systems: a comparison between the use of a microdensitometer and a drum film digitiser.
Verdun FR; Pachoud M; Bergmann D; Buhr E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):208-13. PubMed ID: 15933110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of film-screen combination in a contrast detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 1: Contrast detail diagram].
Hagemann G; Eichbaum G
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 9340021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Canon's flat-panel detector].
Matsumoto M; Sumida I; Ideguchi T; Kawaji Y; Himuro K
Igaku Butsuri; 2002; 22(4):232-45. PubMed ID: 12766269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of resolution and sensitometric characteristics of an asymmetric screen-film imaging system.
Gray JE; Stears JG; Swensen SJ; Bunch PC
Radiology; 1993 Aug; 188(2):537-9. PubMed ID: 8327711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of scintillator on the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) of a digital imaging system.
Farman TT; Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Miller SR; Lempicki A; Farman AG
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Feb; 101(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 16448925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
