BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8136415)

  • 21. Accuracy, precision and user-acceptability of self blood glucose monitoring machines.
    Chan JC; Wong RY; Cheung CK; Lam P; Chow CC; Yeung VT; Kan EC; Loo KM; Mong MY; Cockram CS
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1997 May; 36(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 9229193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance of three blood glucose meters.
    Rheney CC; Kirk JK
    Ann Pharmacother; 2000 Mar; 34(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 10917376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laboratory and clinical evaluation of two glucose meters for the neonatal intensive care unit.
    Perkins SL; Doelle H; Escares E; Forsythe J; Pronovost C; Taylor-Clapp S
    Clin Biochem; 1998 Mar; 31(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 9622768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SKML-Quality Mark for point-of-care test (POCT) glucose meters and glucose meters for home-use.
    Jansen RT; Slingerland RJ
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2010 Jul; 48(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 20459353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of two reagent strips and three reflectance meters for rapid determination of blood glucose concentrations.
    Joseph RJ; Allyson K; Graves TK; Rondeau MJ; Peterson ME
    J Vet Intern Med; 1987; 1(4):170-4. PubMed ID: 3506102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. New, small, fast acting blood glucose meters--an analytical laboratory evaluation.
    Weitgasser R; Hofmann M; Gappmayer B; Garstenauer C
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2007 Sep; 137(37-38):536-40. PubMed ID: 17990144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The accuracy of home glucose meters for the glucose range anticipated in pregnancy.
    Moses R; Schier G; Matthews J; Davis W
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Aug; 37(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 9325505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laboratory evaluation of the Glucocard blood glucose test meter.
    Lewis BD
    Clin Chem; 1992 Oct; 38(10):2093-5. PubMed ID: 1394997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Current portable blood sugar analysis equipment--comparison of the MediSense Card, Glucometer Elite, Hypocount Supreme and Omnican Control with the glucose oxidase reference method].
    Weitgasser R; Gappmayer B
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1997 Jan; 127(1-2):12-7. PubMed ID: 9036524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparison of the accuracy and precision of 7 reflectometers in self-control of blood glucose].
    Regal H; Zdolsek I; Irsigler K
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1989 Feb; 139(3):56-61. PubMed ID: 2705325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation and comparison of Reflolux II and Glucometer II, two new portable reflectance meters for capillary blood glucose determination.
    Schier GM; Moses RG; Gan IE; Blair SC
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 1988 Feb; 4(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 3359917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the effects of insufficient blood volume samples on the performance of blood glucose self-test meters.
    Pfützner A; Schipper C; Ramljak S; Flacke F; Sieber J; Forst T; Musholt PB
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1522-9. PubMed ID: 24351178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Glucose meters: evaluation of the new formulation measuring strips from Roche (Accu-Chek) and Abbott (MediSense).
    Dimeski G; Jones BW; Tilley V; Greenslade MN; Russell AW
    Ann Clin Biochem; 2010 Jul; 47(Pt 4):358-65. PubMed ID: 20592335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a new blood glucose reflectance meter and comparison with visually interpreted strips.
    Kalk WJ; Constable J; Osler C; Rowe P
    S Afr Med J; 1985 Mar; 67(11):407-9. PubMed ID: 3983718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improving the quality of self-monitoring blood glucose measurement: a study in reducing calibration errors.
    Baum JM; Monhaut NM; Parker DR; Price CP
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2006 Jun; 8(3):347-57. PubMed ID: 16800756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of point-of-care-testing glucose meters with standard laboratory measurement of the 50g-glucose-challenge test (GCT) during pregnancy.
    Buhling KJ; Henrich W; Kjos SL; Siebert G; Starr E; Dreweck C; Stein U; Dudenhausen JW
    Clin Biochem; 2003 Jul; 36(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 12849863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic electrochemistry corrects for hematocrit interference on blood glucose determinations with patient self-measurement devices.
    Musholt PB; Schipper C; Thomé N; Ramljak S; Schmidt M; Forst T; Pfützner A
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2011 Sep; 5(5):1167-75. PubMed ID: 22027312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical and statistical evaluation of self-monitoring blood glucose meters.
    Poirier JY; Le Prieur N; Campion L; Guilhem I; Allannic H; Maugendre D
    Diabetes Care; 1998 Nov; 21(11):1919-24. PubMed ID: 9802744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A laboratory trial of two new blood-glucose reflectance meters featuring automatic external calibration.
    Walford S; Home PD; Alberti KG
    Ann Clin Biochem; 1984 Mar; 21 ( Pt 2)():116-9. PubMed ID: 6712141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance of a new interference-resistant glucose meter.
    Vanavanan S; Santanirand P; Chaichanajarernkul U; Chittamma A; Dubois JA; Shirey T; Heinz M
    Clin Biochem; 2010 Jan; 43(1-2):186-92. PubMed ID: 19769953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.