These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8136480)
21. Vertebral bone mineral measurement using dual photon absorptiometry and computed tomography. Eriksson S; Isberg B; Lindgren U Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 2964852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Determination of vertebral fracture threshold by measuring bone mineral content in the lumbar vertebrae]. Yuh I; Yamamoto I; Ohnaka Y; Takada M; Masuda K; Murata K; Shigei M; Koshikawa Y; Morita R Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb; 52(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 1561061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Vertebral bone density in Scheuermann disease. Gilsanz V; Gibbens DT; Carlson M; King J J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1989 Jul; 71(6):894-7. PubMed ID: 2745485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results. Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Contribution of the cortical shell of vertebrae to mechanical behaviour of the lumbar vertebrae with implications for predicting fracture risk. Andresen R; Werner HJ; Schober HC Br J Radiol; 1998 Jul; 71(847):759-65. PubMed ID: 9771387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Factors affecting the precision of bone mineral measurements. Part 1: Review of experimentally derived results obtained from single photon absorptiometry. McDonald SP; Cormack J; Evill CA; Sage MR Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1990 Mar; 13(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 2337398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The relationship between bone mineral density, vertebral body shape and spinal curvature in the elderly thoracolumbar spine: an in vitro study. Edmondston SJ; Singer KP; Price RI; Day RE; Breidahl PD Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):969-75. PubMed ID: 8000841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [The accuracy and reproducibility of the measurement of bone mineral content by single-photon absorptiometry (125I). The effect of source strength]. Cattaneo GM; Rinaldi GP; Rubinacci A Radiol Med; 1992; 83(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 1557545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Design and Validation of Synchronous QCT Calibration Phantom: Practical Methodology. Malekzadeh M; Abbasi-Rad S; Shahgholi M; Naghdi P; Hoseini MS; Yazdi NA; Shiran MB; Rad HS J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 50(1):157-162. PubMed ID: 30777238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A quantitative analysis of rat osteoporosis model with a microfocus X-ray tube and digital radiography system. Nakagawa K; Igaki H; Aoki Y; Ohtomo K; Kawaguchi H; Eto M Radiat Med; 1999; 17(2):165-8. PubMed ID: 10399786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Vertebral body lesions as an interference factor in quantitative computed tomography of the lumbar spine. An analysis of 1116 standardized performed measurements]. Montag M; Roos N; Peters PE Rofo; 1989 Sep; 151(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 2552525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Dietary chlortetracycline induces differential effects on the accuracy of quantitative computed tomography and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in assessing vertebral bone mineral density in growing pigs. Guillot M; Alexander K; Pomar C; del Castillo JR Vet J; 2010 Aug; 185(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 19501002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cross-calibration of liquid and solid QCT calibration standards: corrections to the UCSF normative data. Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Grampp S; Genant HK Osteoporos Int; 1993 Jan; 3(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 8422515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [An experimental study of quantitative bone mineral analysis using computed tomography with calibration phantom]. Shimizu H Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1988 Dec; 62(12):1199-210. PubMed ID: 3249102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Adaptation of computed tomography and roentgenography to bone density measurements]. Tatoń G; Korkosz M; Głuszko P; Kuśmiderski J; Rokita E; Urbanik A Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(7-8):494-7. PubMed ID: 10575916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of calibration methods for estimating bone mineral densities in trauma patients with quantitative CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Goodsitt MM; Christodoulou EG; Larson SC; Kazerooni EA Acad Radiol; 2001 Sep; 8(9):822-34. PubMed ID: 11724037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of calibration materials in single- and dual-energy quantitative CT. Steenbeek JC; van Kuijk C; Grashuis JL Radiology; 1992 Jun; 183(3):849-55. PubMed ID: 1584946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Value of radiologic procedures in diagnosis of osteoporosis of the axial skeleton]. Schmidt M Bildgebung; 1993 Jun; 60(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 8358219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]