These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8137171)

  • 1. Auditory selective attention in the human cochlea.
    Giard MH; Collet L; Bouchet P; Pernier J
    Brain Res; 1994 Jan; 633(1-2):353-6. PubMed ID: 8137171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative influence of repeated measurement and of attention on evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Meric C; Collet L
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1993 Jul; 113(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 8379301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual attention and evoked otoacoustic emissions: a slight but real effect.
    Meric C; Collet L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 1992 May; 12(3):233-5. PubMed ID: 1639669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of auditory stimulation and visual attention on otoacoustic emissions.
    Ferber-Viart C; Duclaux R; Collet L; Guyonnard F
    Physiol Behav; 1995 Jun; 57(6):1075-9. PubMed ID: 7652027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attention effects on the auditory event-related potential.
    Näätänen R; Teder W
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1991; 491():161-6; discussion 167. PubMed ID: 1814148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of focused auditory attention on cochlear activity in humans.
    Maison S; Micheyl C; Collet L
    Psychophysiology; 2001 Jan; 38(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11321619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differential effects of ear-canal pressure and contralateral acoustic stimulation on evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Morgon A
    Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 61(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 1526893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evoked otoacoustic emissions and auditory selective attention.
    Michie PT; LePage EL; Solowij N; Haller M; Terry L
    Hear Res; 1996 Sep; 98(1-2):54-67. PubMed ID: 8880181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Variability of the influence of a visual task on the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea.
    Froehlich P; Collet L; Chanal JM; Morgon A
    Brain Res; 1990 Feb; 508(2):286-8. PubMed ID: 2306619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discontinuity of early and late event-related brain potentials for selective attention in dichotic listening.
    Ikeda K
    Neuroreport; 2018 Apr; 29(6):495-503. PubMed ID: 29538097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selective attention modifies the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea.
    Puel JL; Bonfils P; Pujol R
    Brain Res; 1988 May; 447(2):380-3. PubMed ID: 3390709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dichotic listening and otoacoustic emissions: shared variance between cochlear function and dichotic listening performance in adults with normal hearing.
    Markevych V; Asbjørnsen AE; Lind O; Plante E; Cone B
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Jul; 76(2):332-9. PubMed ID: 21474228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early attention effects in human auditory-evoked potentials.
    Hoormann J; Falkenstein M; Hohnsbein J
    Psychophysiology; 2000 Jan; 37(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 10705765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cross-modal selective attention on the sensory periphery: cochlear sensitivity is altered by selective attention.
    Srinivasan S; Keil A; Stratis K; Woodruff Carr KL; Smith DW
    Neuroscience; 2012 Oct; 223():325-32. PubMed ID: 22871520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables.
    Veuillet E; Collet L; Duclaux R
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Mar; 65(3):724-35. PubMed ID: 2051201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evoked otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing infants and children: emerging data and issues.
    Norton SJ; Widen JE
    Ear Hear; 1990 Apr; 11(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 2340965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetric cochlear processing mimics hemispheric specialization.
    Sininger YS; Cone-Wesson B
    Science; 2004 Sep; 305(5690):1581. PubMed ID: 15361617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between evoked otoacoustic emissions and middle-ear dynamic characteristics.
    Wada H; Ohyama K; Kobayashi T; Sunaga N; Koike T
    Audiology; 1993; 32(5):282-92. PubMed ID: 8216027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Rana B; Barman A
    J Laryngol Otol; 2011 Sep; 125(9):911-6. PubMed ID: 21729428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age-related changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Collet L; Moulin A; Gartner M; Morgon A
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1990 Dec; 99(12):993-7. PubMed ID: 2244732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.