These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8138080)

  • 1. [Neurophysiologic effects of short-term exposure to ultra-low-frequency magnetic field].
    Lyskov EB; Aleksanian ZA; Iousmiaki V; Medvedev SV; Partanen Iu; Safonova TE; Khanninen O; Iutilaĭnen Iu
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1993; 19(6):121-5. PubMed ID: 8138080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of electrophysiological responses in rabbits affected by short-term exposure to static magnetic field.
    Nakagawa M
    Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi; 1984 Feb; 38(6):899-908. PubMed ID: 6748322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
    König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to interaural time delay and interaural correlation.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):106-15. PubMed ID: 16934951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The spectral characteristics of short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Khachunts AS; Vaganian LG; Bagdasarian RA; Tatevosian NE; Tatevosian IG; Kostanian EG; Bilian RN; Manasian KA
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 2000; 26(1):124-9. PubMed ID: 10752302
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reverse adaptation studied by recording short-latency auditory evoked potentials].
    Petrov SM; Pudov AI
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1998; 24(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 9778900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Dynamics of brain bioelectric activity and reaction time after exposure to an alternating magnetic field].
    Medvedev SV; Lyskov EB; Aleksanian ZA; Iousmiaki V; Iutilaĭnen Iu; Partanen Iu; Rutkovskaia IuM; Safonova TA; Khaninen O
    Fiziol Cheloveka; 1992; 18(5):41-7. PubMed ID: 1473643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory-evoked potentials to frequency increase and decrease of high- and low-frequency tones.
    Pratt H; Starr A; Michalewski HJ; Dimitrijevic A; Bleich N; Mittelman N
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Feb; 120(2):360-73. PubMed ID: 19070543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exposure to ELF magnetic and ELF-modulated radiofrequency fields: the time course of physiological and cognitive effects observed in recent studies (2001-2005).
    Cook CM; Saucier DM; Thomas AW; Prato FS
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2006 Dec; 27(8):613-27. PubMed ID: 16724317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of center frequency on binaural auditory filter bandwidth in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Shimokura R; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2008 Nov; 19(17):1709-13. PubMed ID: 18841088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of 1/f fluctuation in inter-stimulus intervals on auditory evoked mismatch field.
    Harada N; Masuda T; Endo H; Nakamura Y; Takeda T; Tonoike M
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 May; 379(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 15843068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of electromagnetic field emitted by cellular phones on the EEG during an auditory memory task: a double blind replication study.
    Krause CM; Haarala C; Sillanmäki L; Koivisto M; Alanko K; Revonsuo A; Laine M; Hämäläinen H
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2004 Jan; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 14696051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of thirty minutes mobile phone use on the human sensory cortex.
    Yuasa K; Arai N; Okabe S; Tarusawa Y; Nojima T; Hanajima R; Terao Y; Ugawa Y
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr; 117(4):900-5. PubMed ID: 16439184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory evoked fields to variations of interaural time delay.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S; Tonoike M
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 383(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 15955427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiparametric auditory receptive field organization across five cortical fields in the albino rat.
    Polley DB; Read HL; Storace DA; Merzenich MM
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3621-38. PubMed ID: 17376842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence implicates automatic low-level feature detectors in perceptual asymmetry.
    Bishop DV; O'reilly J; McArthur GM
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):177-9. PubMed ID: 15922169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence that transduction of electromagnetic field is mediated by a force receptor.
    Marino AA; Carrubba S; Frilot C; Chesson AL
    Neurosci Lett; 2009 Mar; 452(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 19383425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human EEG very high frequency oscillations reflect the number of matches with a template in auditory short-term memory.
    Lenz D; Jeschke M; Schadow J; Naue N; Ohl FW; Herrmann CS
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():81-92. PubMed ID: 18036577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensory gating of auditory evoked and induced gamma band activity in intracranial recordings.
    Trautner P; Rosburg T; Dietl T; Fell J; Korzyukov OA; Kurthen M; Schaller C; Elger CE; Boutros NN
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):790-8. PubMed ID: 16809054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of the binaural auditory filter in the human brain.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2007 Dec; 18(18):1939-43. PubMed ID: 18007191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.