BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8138307)

  • 1. Proximal femoral fractures: a biomechanical study to compare intramedullary and extramedullary fixation.
    Curtis MJ; Jinnah RH; Wilson V; Cunningham BW
    Injury; 1994 Mar; 25(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 8138307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Jul; (3):CD000093. PubMed ID: 18646058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 16235272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The early failure of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw in femurs with a wide medullary canal. A biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures.
    Ceynowa M; Zerdzicki K; Klosowski P; Pankowski R; Rocławski M; Mazurek T
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Jan; 71():201-207. PubMed ID: 31775090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Sep; (9):CD000093. PubMed ID: 20824825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 14973946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison and analysis of reoperations in two different treatment protocols for trochanteric hip fractures - postoperative technical complications with dynamic hip screw, intramedullary nail and Medoff sliding plate.
    Paulsson J; Stig JC; Olsson O
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):364. PubMed ID: 28836973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (4):CD000093. PubMed ID: 12519535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures. A biomechanical study.
    Kummer FJ; Olsson O; Pearlman CA; Ceder L; Larsson S; Koval KJ
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1998 Dec; 69(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 9930101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures.
    Parker MJ; Handoll HH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD000093. PubMed ID: 11869563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur.
    Adams CI; Robinson CM; Court-Brown CM; McQueen MM
    J Orthop Trauma; 2001 Aug; 15(6):394-400. PubMed ID: 11514765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Techniques of extramedullary osteosynthesis in proximal femoral fractures].
    Ostermann PA; Haase N; Ekkernkamp N
    Chirurg; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1271-6. PubMed ID: 11766649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment of reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures with use of an intramedullary nail or a 95 degrees screw-plate: a prospective, randomized study.
    Sadowski C; Lübbeke A; Saudan M; Riand N; Stern R; Hoffmeyer P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Mar; 84(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 11886906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Therapeutic possibilities in trochanteric fractures. Safe--fast--stable].
    Dávid A; von der Heyde D; Pommer A
    Orthopade; 2000 Apr; 29(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 10851690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cost-effectiveness analysis of fixation options for intertrochanteric hip fractures.
    Swart E; Makhni EC; Macaulay W; Rosenwasser MP; Bozic KJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Oct; 96(19):1612-20. PubMed ID: 25274786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auxiliary locking plate improves fracture stability and healing in intertrochanteric fractures fixated by intramedullary nail.
    Eberle S; Gabel J; Hungerer S; Hoffmann S; Pätzold R; Augat P; Bühren V
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Dec; 27(10):1006-10. PubMed ID: 22884619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Current status of therapy of subtrochanteric femoral fractures].
    Hoffmann R; Südkamp NP; Schütz M; Raschke M; Haas NP
    Unfallchirurg; 1996 Apr; 99(4):240-8. PubMed ID: 8658203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures.
    Baumgaertner MR; Curtin SL; Lindskog DM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):87-94. PubMed ID: 9553538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw.
    Madsen JE; Naess L; Aune AK; Alho A; Ekeland A; Strømsøe K
    J Orthop Trauma; 1998 May; 12(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 9619458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk].
    Friedl W; Clausen J
    Chirurg; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1344-52. PubMed ID: 11766660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.