These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8138779)

  • 1. Effects of truncation on reaction time analysis.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1994 Mar; 123(1):34-80. PubMed ID: 8138779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing for an ignorable sampling bias under random double truncation.
    de Uña-Álvarez J
    Stat Med; 2023 Sep; 42(20):3732-3744. PubMed ID: 37312237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A pairwise likelihood augmented Cox estimator for left-truncated data.
    Wu F; Kim S; Qin J; Saran R; Li Y
    Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28853158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left truncation results in substantial bias of the relation between time-dependent exposures and adverse events.
    Hazelbag CM; Klungel OH; van Staa TP; de Boer A; Groenwold RH
    Ann Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 25(8):590-6. PubMed ID: 25935711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing estimation approaches for the illness-death model under left truncation and right censoring.
    Vakulenko-Lagun B; Mandel M
    Stat Med; 2016 Apr; 35(9):1533-48. PubMed ID: 26553433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cox regression model with doubly truncated data.
    Rennert L; Xie SX
    Biometrics; 2018 Jun; 74(2):725-733. PubMed ID: 29073330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conditional maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric transformation model with LTRC data.
    Chen CM; Shen PS
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2018 Apr; 24(2):250-272. PubMed ID: 28168333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Percentile rank pooling: A simple nonparametric method for comparing group reaction time distributions with few trials.
    Miller J
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Apr; 53(2):781-791. PubMed ID: 32869140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CASANOVA: Permutation inference in factorial survival designs.
    Ditzhaus M; Genuneit J; Janssen A; Pauly M
    Biometrics; 2023 Mar; 79(1):203-215. PubMed ID: 34608996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments in papers submitted to ATLA.
    Festing MF
    Altern Lab Anim; 2001; 29(4):427-46. PubMed ID: 11506638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of clinical trials with early stopping: an investigation of potential bias.
    Schou IM; Marschner IC
    Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):4859-74. PubMed ID: 23824994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Left truncation in linked data: A practical guide to understanding left truncation and applying it using SAS and R.
    Jin Y; Ton TGN; Incerti D; Hu S
    Pharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 22(1):194-204. PubMed ID: 35843723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation.
    Schisterman EF; Cole SR; Ye A; Platt RW
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 27(5):491-502. PubMed ID: 23930785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bias due to left truncation and left censoring in longitudinal studies of developmental and disease processes.
    Cain KC; Harlow SD; Little RJ; Nan B; Yosef M; Taffe JR; Elliott MR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 May; 173(9):1078-84. PubMed ID: 21422059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of incidence and prognosis from 'extreme' case-control designs.
    Salim A; Ma X; Fall K; Andrén O; Reilly M
    Stat Med; 2014 Dec; 33(30):5388-98. PubMed ID: 24980445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bias: a review of current understanding.
    Adebiyi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2010 Sep; 39(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 21416795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing goodness of fit of a uniform truncation model.
    Mandel M; Betensky RA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 17688493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of a stochastic model to ascertain the truncation bias and systematic component of variation in closed birth interval.
    Pathak KB; Pandey A
    Sankhya; 1990; 52(3):261-70. PubMed ID: 12285389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A framework for ML estimation of parameters of (mixtures of) common reaction time distributions given optional truncation or censoring.
    Dolan CV; van der Maas HL; Molenaar PC
    Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Aug; 34(3):304-23. PubMed ID: 12395546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.