80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8139431)
21. Does quantity of film reading affect quality?
Given-Wilson R; Blanks R
Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 21216322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Digital roentgenographic systems based on photostimulated screens and their comparison with roentgenographic screen-film sets].
Gorelik FG; Stankevich NE
Med Tekh; 2006; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 17133936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Recommendations for the X-ray film usage in our country practice].
Gorelik FG
Med Tekh; 2003; (5):39-42. PubMed ID: 14603851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. X-ray film duplicators. ECRI.
J Healthc Mater Manage; 1994 Apr; 12(4):41-3. PubMed ID: 10134613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. No adverse results.
Fanning B
Br Dent J; 2009 Jun; 206(12):607-8. PubMed ID: 19557038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. An unexpected artefact with low-contrast high-energy film.
Cowley I; Thomas S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):N17-21. PubMed ID: 16357425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Approach to the development of radiologic data base].
Chikirdin EG
Med Tekh; 1993; (6):9-10. PubMed ID: 8139432
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [A cassette with a mechanism for removal of radiographic film].
Sakhno NV; Chervanev VA; Troianovskaia LP; Priakhina NA
Med Tekh; 2006; (1):43. PubMed ID: 16610289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Optimization of dynamic fuzziness and enhancement of image quality of an URI/230-Amethyst digital image intensifier].
Blinov AB; Kozlovskiĭ EB; Luzin SI; Plutov IG; Rodin VI
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):6-8. PubMed ID: 12512273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. kVp cassette measurements.
DeWerd LA; Ranallo F
Radiol Technol; 1989; 61(2):145-6. PubMed ID: 2587732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Medical x-ray equipment on the threshold of the 21st century].
Blinov NN; Mazurov AI
Med Tekh; 1999; (5):3-6. PubMed ID: 10560086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [-Overexposed film--underexposed film-].
Patrux C
Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 9754345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The use of x-ray film by dental professionals in the United States.
Platin E
Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):396-400, 402. PubMed ID: 12046402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
Egyed M; Shearer DR
Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Technique charts for Kodak EC-L film screen system for portal localization in a 6MV X-ray beam.
Sandilos P; Antypas C; Paraskevopoulou C; Kouvaris J; Vlachos L
Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(6):467-72. PubMed ID: 17148858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Medical and technical evaluation of drying cabinet for radiologic film ShS-160].
Chikirdin EG; Astrakhantsev FA; Petrov BI
Med Tekh; 1995; (1):21-2. PubMed ID: 7783584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Comparative analysis of digital x-ray image detector design techniques].
Veĭl IuA; Mazurov AI
Med Tekh; 2008; (5):36-40. PubMed ID: 19048864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [The University of X-ray Laboratory Assistants. Lesson 5. Image contrast].
Chikridin EG
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1998; (4):40-9. PubMed ID: 9755637
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
