These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8139669)

  • 1. Don't call us..
    Miller JB
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6467):93. PubMed ID: 8139669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits of peer-reviewed publication.
    Klein CN
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1991 Jul; 48(7):1424, 1426. PubMed ID: 1882865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
    Shim EH; Parekh V
    Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What the numbers don't tell us.
    Parrott R
    Health Commun; 2010 Sep; 25(6-7):523-4. PubMed ID: 20845131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Family Medicine after one year.
    Weiss BD; Magill MK; Smith MA
    Fam Med; 1993 Jan; 25(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 8454117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Don't be so scrupulous about the percentage!].
    Eitrem R
    Lakartidningen; 1997 Feb; 94(9):710. PubMed ID: 9091740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Peer review is complicated.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1760. PubMed ID: 15902192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meyer paper: don't hang the Soc. Wash. out to dry.
    Helgen KM
    Nature; 2004 Dec; 432(7020):949. PubMed ID: 15616531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overuse of impact factors suppresses controversial ideas.
    Gillis JM
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Feb; 2(2):101. PubMed ID: 10195188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Our editing work and analysis of peer review in 1994-98].
    Loría A; Lisker R
    Rev Invest Clin; 2000; 52(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 10818811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Peer review: is one-eye king?].
    de Jong BC; Overbeke AJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Jan; 137(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 8419837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review.
    Oldham RK
    Mol Biother; 1992 Mar; 4(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 1627269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review.
    Rosenfeld RM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Aug; 137(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 17666237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review and the rewards of open access.
    Newmark P
    Nature; 2003 Apr; 422(6933):661. PubMed ID: 12700733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific publishing. Don't pretty up that picture just yet.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5807):1866-8. PubMed ID: 17185580
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publishing--part II.
    Vogt HB
    S D Med; 2007 Mar; 60(3):95, 97. PubMed ID: 17460850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Referees: their roles, rights, and responsibilities.
    Pitkin RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep; 82(3):464. PubMed ID: 8355955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Harefuah peer review].
    Shemer Y; Shoenfeld Y
    Harefuah; 2001 May; 140(5):403-5. PubMed ID: 11419062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Peer review warts and all.
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.