139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8139837)
1. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography.
Halse A; Espelid I; Tveit AB; White SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography.
Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; de Paiva GA; Bóscolo FN
Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16878203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization.
Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a photostimulable storage phosphor digital system with or without the sharpen filter and cone beam CT for detecting approximal enamel subsurface demineralization.
Belém MD; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120313. PubMed ID: 23412461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces.
Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Ellwood R; Alatsaris M; Nugent Z
Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17284913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal enamel subsurface demineralization and its relationship with calcium loss and lesion depth.
Onem E; Baksi BG; Sen BH; Sögüt O; Mert A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 22074868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin.
Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images.
Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital subtraction radiography for monitoring dental demineralization. An in vitro study.
Eberhard J; Hartman B; Lenhard M; Mayer T; Kocher T; Eickholz P
Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 10867420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of external root resorption using digital subtraction radiography.
Kravitz LH; Tyndall DA; Bagnell CP; Dove SB
J Endod; 1992 Jun; 18(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 1402585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries.
Belém MD; Ambrosano GM; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Haiter-Neto F
Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 23739784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Periodontal disease morbidity quantification. II. Validation of alveolar bone loss measurements and vertical defect diagnosis from digital bite-wing images.
Hildebolt CF; Vannier MW; Shrout MK; Pilgram TK; Province M; Vahey EP; Rietz DW
J Periodontol; 1990 Oct; 61(10):623-32. PubMed ID: 2231229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
Gröndahl K
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
