These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8139837)
1. Detection of mineral loss in approximal enamel by subtraction radiography. Halse A; Espelid I; Tveit AB; White SC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Feb; 77(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 8139837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of enamel demineralization using conventional, digital, and digitized radiography. Ferreira RI; Haiter-Neto F; Tabchoury CP; de Paiva GA; Bóscolo FN Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 16878203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Linear and logarithmic subtraction for detecting enamel subsurface demineralization. Haiter-Neto F; Ferreira RI; Tabchoury CP; Bóscolo FN Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 15897282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a photostimulable storage phosphor digital system with or without the sharpen filter and cone beam CT for detecting approximal enamel subsurface demineralization. Belém MD; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Groppo FC; Haiter-Neto F Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(5):20120313. PubMed ID: 23412461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces. Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Ellwood R; Alatsaris M; Nugent Z Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17284913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of proximal enamel subsurface demineralization and its relationship with calcium loss and lesion depth. Onem E; Baksi BG; Sen BH; Sögüt O; Mert A Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 May; 41(4):285-93. PubMed ID: 22074868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study. Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs. Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Histologic and radiographic assessment of caries-like lesions localized at the crown margin. Zoellner A; Diemer B; Weber HP; Stassinakis A; Gaengler P J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12239481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of logarithmic contrast enhancement on subtraction images. Versteeg KH; van der Stelt PF Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Oct; 80(4):479-86. PubMed ID: 8521113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital subtraction radiography for monitoring dental demineralization. An in vitro study. Eberhard J; Hartman B; Lenhard M; Mayer T; Kocher T; Eickholz P Caries Res; 2000; 34(3):219-24. PubMed ID: 10867420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography. Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]