These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8139905)

  • 1. [Fundamental errors in observed researches].
    Sørensen HT; Møller-Petersen J; Sabroe S; Vilstrup H
    Nord Med; 1994; 109(3):91-2. PubMed ID: 8139905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bias.
    Delgado-Rodríguez M; Llorca J
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 Aug; 58(8):635-41. PubMed ID: 15252064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of measurement error in the study of sexually transmitted infections.
    Myer L; Morroni C; Link BG
    Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Aug; 80(4):318-23, 328. PubMed ID: 15295134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bias in research.
    Agabegi SS; Stern PJ
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2008 May; 37(5):242-8. PubMed ID: 18587501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is child maltreatment a leading cause of delinquency?
    Schwartz IM; Rendon JA; Hsieh CM
    Child Welfare; 1994; 73(5):639-55. PubMed ID: 7924568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interpreting the term selection bias in medical research.
    Mark DH
    Fam Med; 1997 Feb; 29(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 9048175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confounding and effect modification: their significance in medical research.
    Olayinka BA
    Cent Afr J Med; 1997 Jan; 43(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 9185379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sources of error in clinical research.
    Kumar R; Kumar S
    Indian Pediatr; 1996 Dec; 33(12):1029-32. PubMed ID: 9141804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Chapter IV. The effects of respondent rules on health survey reports.
    Mathiowetz NA; Groves RM
    Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):26-32. PubMed ID: 15791753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sources of variation in spirometric measurements. Identifying the signal and dealing with noise.
    Becklake MR; White N
    Occup Med; 1993; 8(2):241-64. PubMed ID: 8506504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analytic epidemiology and periodontal diseases.
    Heaton B; Dietrich T
    Periodontol 2000; 2012 Feb; 58(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 22133370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten categories of statistical errors: a guide for research in endocrinology and metabolism.
    Holmes TH
    Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab; 2004 Apr; 286(4):E495-501. PubMed ID: 15010353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External validity: a forgotten issue?
    Palla S; Farella M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):293-4. PubMed ID: 20812434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making inferences on treatment effects from real world data: propensity scores, confounding by indication, and other perils for the unwary in observational research.
    Freemantle N; Marston L; Walters K; Wood J; Reynolds MR; Petersen I
    BMJ; 2013 Nov; 347():f6409. PubMed ID: 24217206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Do You Know Which Health Care Effectiveness Research You Can Trust? A Guide to Study Design for the Perplexed.
    Soumerai SB; Starr D; Majumdar SR
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Jun; 12():E101. PubMed ID: 26111157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study design II. Issues of chance, bias, confounding and contamination.
    Levin KA
    Evid Based Dent; 2005; 6(4):102-3. PubMed ID: 16355244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating quantitative research designs: Part 2.
    Haughey BP
    Crit Care Nurse; 1994 Dec; 14(6):69-72. PubMed ID: 7712803
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Confounding and bias in epidemiological investigations.
    Hammal DM; Bell CL
    Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2002 Sep; 19(6):375-81. PubMed ID: 12186359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating research: what it means to you.
    Maklebust J; Margolis DJ
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(4):4, 6. PubMed ID: 9306780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating qualitative research studies.
    Pickler RH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2007; 21(3):195-7. PubMed ID: 17478311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.