These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8140065)

  • 1. Transcervical CVS sample size: correlation with placental location, cytogenetic findings, and pregnancy outcome.
    McIntosh N; Rubin C; Wang B; Williams J
    Prenat Diagn; 1993 Nov; 13(11):1031-6. PubMed ID: 8140065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Initiating a chorionic villus sampling program. Relying on placental location as the primary determinant of the sampling route.
    Silver RK; MacGregor SN; Sholl JS; Elesh RH; Beaird JA; Waldee JK
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Oct; 35(10):964-8. PubMed ID: 2246764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of pregnancy loss between transcervical and transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.
    Silver RK; MacGregor SN; Muhlbach LH; Kambich MP; Ragin A
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 May; 83(5 Pt 1):657-60. PubMed ID: 8164920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Chorionic villus needle sampling by the transabdominal route or by placental centesis. A series of 930 cases].
    Guidicelli B; Levy A; Piquet C; Gamerre M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1993; 22(8):851-5. PubMed ID: 8132961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transcervical chorionic villus sampling: a practical guide.
    Stergiotou I; Borobio V; Bennasar M; Goncé A; Mula R; Nuruddin M; Soler A; Borrell A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(8):1244-51. PubMed ID: 26067265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Chorionic villi sampling: choice of transcervical or transabdominal routes preferable to use of transcervical route exclusively].
    Appelman Z; Caspi B; Rosensaft J; Chemke J; Insler V
    Harefuah; 1992 Dec; 123(11):437-9, 508. PubMed ID: 1487195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized comparison of transcervical and transabdominal chorionic-villus sampling. The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Chorionic-Villus Sampling and Amniocentesis Study Group.
    Jackson LG; Zachary JM; Fowler SE; Desnick RJ; Golbus MS; Ledbetter DH; Mahoney MJ; Pergament E; Simpson JL; Black S
    N Engl J Med; 1992 Aug; 327(9):594-8. PubMed ID: 1640952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Chorionic villus sampling: transabdominal versus transcervical approach in more than 4000 cases.
    Hallak M; Johnson MP; Pryde PG; Isada NB; Zador IE; Evans MI
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):349-52. PubMed ID: 1495690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study comparing transcervical with transabdominal chorionic villus sampling (CVS).
    Mackenzie WE; Holmes DS; Newton JR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Jan; 95(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 3342211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk evaluation in a small series of transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.
    Bergman B; Claesson U; Mark J
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1991; 31(4):189-91. PubMed ID: 1885085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Experience with 1251 transcervical chorionic villus samplings performed in the first trimester by a single team of operators.
    Donner C; Simon P; Karioun A; Delneste D; Abramowicz M; Cochaux P; Rodesch F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 May; 60(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 7635230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison between transabdominal and transcervical chorionic villus sampling in clinical application for prenatal diagnosis].
    Luo YM; Fang Q; Yang YZ; Chen JH; Chen ML; Chen YZ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Nov; 43(11):814-7. PubMed ID: 19087562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. First trimester chorionic villus sampling in twin gestations.
    De Catte L; Liebaers I; Foulon W; Bonduelle M; Van Assche E
    Am J Perinatol; 1996 Oct; 13(7):413-7. PubMed ID: 8960610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcervical chorionic villus sampling in multiple pregnancies using a biopsy forceps.
    Casals G; Borrell A; Martínez JM; Soler A; Cararach V; Fortuny A
    Prenat Diagn; 2002 Mar; 22(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 11920906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. First-trimester fetal reduction to a singleton infant or twins: outcome in relation to the final number and karyotyping before reduction by transabdominal chorionic villus sampling.
    Brambati B; Tului L; Camurri L; Guercilena S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 191(6):2035-40. PubMed ID: 15592288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The safety and efficacy of chorionic villus sampling for early prenatal diagnosis of cytogenetic abnormalities.
    Rhoads GG; Jackson LG; Schlesselman SE; de la Cruz FF; Desnick RJ; Golbus MS; Ledbetter DH; Lubs HA; Mahoney MJ; Pergament E
    N Engl J Med; 1989 Mar; 320(10):609-17. PubMed ID: 2645520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transcervical chorionic villus sampling beyond 12 weeks of gestation.
    Borrell A; Costa D; Delgado RD; Fuster JJ; Soler A; Cararach J; Fortuny A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):416-20. PubMed ID: 8807757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility, accuracy and safety of chorionic villus sampling: a report of 10741 cases.
    Brun JL; Mangione R; Gangbo F; Guyon F; Taine L; Roux D; Maugey-Laulom B; Horovitz J; Saura R
    Prenat Diagn; 2003 Apr; 23(4):295-301. PubMed ID: 12673633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal karyotyping by chorionic villus sampling after the first trimester.
    Carroll SG; Davies T; Kyle PM; Abdel-Fattah S; Soothill PW
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Oct; 106(10):1035-40. PubMed ID: 10519428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The loss rates for invasive prenatal testing in a specialised obstetric ultrasound practice.
    Scott F; Peters H; Boogert T; Robertson R; Anderson J; McLennan A; Kesby G; Edelman D
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Feb; 42(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 11926642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.