These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Magnetic resonance angiography of the extracranial carotid system. Raghavan P; Mukherjee S; Gaughen J; Phillips CD Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Oct; 19(5):241-9. PubMed ID: 19512856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance angiography and carotid artery stenosis: state of the art. Spartera C; Marino G; Morettini G; Di Cesare E; Petrassi C; Bafile G; Ventura M Int Angiol; 1994 Dec; 13(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 7790744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and duplex ultrasonography with digital subtraction angiography. Saloner D AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(6):1034-5. PubMed ID: 12812922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference? Maldonado TS Semin Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 20(4):205-15. PubMed ID: 18082837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral occipital infarcts associated with carotid atherosclerosis and a persistent hypoglossal artery. Conforto AB; de Souza M; Puglia P; Yamamoto FI; da Costa Leite C; Scaff M Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2007 May; 109(4):364-7. PubMed ID: 17224233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease. Liberopoulos K; Kaponis A; Kokkinis K; Pagratis N; Nicolakopoulou Z; Douskou M; Stringaris K; Clonaris C; Balas P Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Lu X; Zhang W; Gui Q; Yu M; Guo Y Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Non-invasive diagnosis of arteriosclerosis]. Masuda Y Kokyu To Junkan; 1991 Feb; 39(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 2017590 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Isolated posterior cerebral artery infarction caused by carotid artery dissection. de Christoph DH; Souza-Lima F; da Saporta MA; de Freitas GR Arch Neurol; 2009 Aug; 66(8):1034-5. PubMed ID: 19667228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis. Modaresi KB; Cox TC; Summers PE; Jarosz JM; Verma H; Taylor PR; Padayachee TS Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noninvasive imaging is improving but digital subtraction angiography remains the gold standard. Hill MD; Demchuk AM; Frayne R Neurology; 2007 Jun; 68(24):2057-8. PubMed ID: 17562825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploratory strategy in adults with transient ischaemic accident seen after the 6th hour. Chiras J; Choufa A J Neuroradiol; 1993 Sep; 20(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 7903982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-invasive testing for cerebrovascular disease. Lord RS Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Aug; 4(4):424-37. PubMed ID: 8866075 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pathology of the supra-aortic blood vessels. Diagnostic aspects]. La Rosa A Minerva Chir; 1986 Nov; 41(22):1885-92. PubMed ID: 3547174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences. Hoggard N Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):356-7. PubMed ID: 15041455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]