These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8140990)

  • 1. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports: use of total quality management to facilitate radiologists' report signing.
    Seltzer SE; Kelly P; Adams DF; Chiango BF; Viera MA; Fener E; Rondeau R; Kazanjian N; Laffel G; Shaffer K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):775-81. PubMed ID: 8140990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Email notification combined with off site signing substantially reduces resident approval to faculty verification time.
    Deitte LA; Moser PP; Geller BS; Sistrom CL
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Jun; 18(6):774-81. PubMed ID: 21371914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiologist report turnaround time: impact of pay-for-performance measures.
    Boland GW; Halpern EF; Gazelle GS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 20729450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expediting the turnaround of radiology reports in a teaching hospital setting.
    Seltzer SE; Kelly P; Adams DF; Chiango BF; Viera MA; Fener E; Hooton S; Bannon-Rohrbach S; Healy CD; Doubilet PM; Holman BL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Apr; 168(4):889-93. PubMed ID: 9124134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time.
    Morgan MB; Branstetter BF; Lionetti DM; Richardson JS; Chang PJ
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Mar; 21(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 17334871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department.
    Cavagna E; Berletti R; Schiavon F; Scarsi B; Barbato G
    Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 12835644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Augmenting the impact of technology adoption with financial incentive to improve radiology report signature times.
    Andriole KP; Prevedello LM; Dufault A; Pezeshk P; Bransfield R; Hanson R; Doubilet PM; Seltzer SE; Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Mar; 7(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 20193925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Audit procedure of radiology reports in a hospital service].
    Barrau V; Rufat P; Charrada L; Menu Y
    J Radiol; 2002 Jun; 83(6 Pt 1):717-21. PubMed ID: 12149588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiology report production times: voice recognition vs. transcription.
    Gale B; Safriel Y; Lukban A; Kalowitz J; Fleischer J; Gordon D
    Radiol Manage; 2001; 23(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 11302062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of RIS/PACS integrated speech recognition on report availability.
    Trumm CG; Morhard D; Ertl-Wagner B; Glaser C; Reiser MF
    Radiol Manage; 2008; 30(6):16-23; quiz 24-6. PubMed ID: 19115708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Success with voice recognition.
    Sferrella SM
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(3):42-9. PubMed ID: 12817421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting.
    Larson DB; Towbin AJ; Pryor RM; Donnelly LF
    Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 23329657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analyzing the differential impact of radiology information systems across radiology modalities.
    Lahiri A; Seidmann A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Oct; 6(10):705-14. PubMed ID: 19800590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving medical imaging report turnaround times.
    Marquez LO
    Radiol Manage; 2005; 27(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 15794377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assessment and improvement: what radiologists do and think.
    Deitch CH; Chan WC; Sunshine JH; Zinninger MD; Cascade PN; Cochran ST
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1245-54. PubMed ID: 7976910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The "open letter": radiologists' reports in the era of patient web portals.
    Bruno MA; Petscavage-Thomas JM; Mohr MJ; Bell SK; Brown SD
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):863-7. PubMed ID: 24836272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality control management and communication between radiologists and technologists.
    Nagy PG; Pierce B; Otto M; Safdar NM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2008 Jun; 5(6):759-65. PubMed ID: 18514956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Six Sigma to improve the film library.
    Benedetto AR; Dunnington JS; Oxford-Zelenske D
    Radiol Manage; 2002; 24(5):26-35; quiz 36-8. PubMed ID: 12422660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.