These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8141956)

  • 21. Rehabilitation plasticity: influence of hearing aid fitting on frequency discrimination performance near the hearing-loss cut-off.
    Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Vesson JF; Collet L
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):49-57. PubMed ID: 16459036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Experiments with a programmable master hearing aid.
    Levitt H; Sullivan JA; Neuman AC; Rubin-Spitz JA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):29-54. PubMed ID: 3430388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Value of in situ measurement for evaluating effective hearing aid amplification at high sound pressure levels].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1993 Jun; 72(6):301-5. PubMed ID: 8333886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients.
    Vermeire K; Anderson I; Flynn M; Van de Heyning P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 18091097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Hearing aid management in young children with residual hearing and implications for use of cochlear implants].
    Arold R; Sesterhenn G; Tiesing S
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Jan; 71(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 1543524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Progressive hearing loss in children with hearing aids].
    Streppel M; Betten T; von Wedel H; Eckel HE; Damm M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Mar; 76(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 9213398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [What improvements can be gained by additional boring in hearing aid fitting?].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Hofer R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Feb; 71(2):79-82. PubMed ID: 1571059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Are real-ear measurements (REM) accurate when using the modified pressure with stored equalization (MPSE) method?
    Shaw P
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 20192873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [In situ measurements for determining the effect of additional boring of the earmold].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K; Stecker M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1990 Jun; 69(6):337-40. PubMed ID: 2378662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress.
    Mueller HG
    Trends Amplif; 2001 Jun; 5(2):35-68. PubMed ID: 25425897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [The effects of hearing level on auditory performance in infants with hearing aids].
    Chen X; Li J; Wu Y; Zhang H; Liu H; Wang S; Kong Y; Liu S; Liu B; Mo L; Qi B
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 26(23):1080-2. PubMed ID: 23451477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Harmonic distortion measurements in clinical hearing and fitting. Preliminary report.
    Nielsen HB; Nielsen H; Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 2336541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of an Automated Hearing Aid Fitting Using Real Ear Measures Embedded in a Manufacturer Fitting Software.
    Brockmeyer A; Voss A; Wick CC; Durakovic N; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):157-163. PubMed ID: 34062602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing aid prescription rules using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G; Backelin L
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(4):211-8. PubMed ID: 6523039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Adaptive fitting of hearing instruments by category loudness scaling (ScalAdapt).
    Kiessling J; Schubert M; Archut A
    Scand Audiol; 1996; 25(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 8881002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Guidelines for the evaluation of hearing aid fitting (2010).
    Kodera K; Hosoi H; Okamoto M; Manabe T; Kanda Y; Shiraishi K; Sugiuchi T; Suzuki K; Tauchi H; Nishimura T; Matsuhira T; Ishikawa K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2016 Jun; 43(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 26654157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sound quality judgements of new hearing instrument users over a 24-week post-fitting period.
    Munro KJ; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2005 Feb; 44(2):92-101. PubMed ID: 15913157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.