These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8142768)
41. [Importance of the terms: threshold value-limiting value--a risk in establishing hygienic normative principles for environmental pollution]. Lüderitz P Z Gesamte Hyg; 1980; 26(7):515-7. PubMed ID: 7445599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [A problem of stability and transformation in the comprehensive hygienic standardization of chemicals]. Zholdakova ZI; Sinitsyna OO; Poliakova EE Gig Sanit; 2002; (6):71-5. PubMed ID: 12516146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. New developments in exposure assessment: the impact on the practice of health risk assessment and epidemiological studies. Nieuwenhuijsen M; Paustenbach D; Duarte-Davidson R Environ Int; 2006 Dec; 32(8):996-1009. PubMed ID: 16875734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Concerning the article by A.I. Khalepo, A.I, Korbakova, I.V. Sanotskiĭ, I.P. Ulanova, "Hygienic aspects of the regulation of occupational chemicals"]. Egorov IuL; Kirillov VF Med Tr Prom Ekol; 1996; (1):27-30. PubMed ID: 8673370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [The estimation of the real hazards of chemical substances based on an analysis of the concentration (dose)-body status relationship]. Avaliani SL; Irodova EV; Pechennikova EV; Shimonova TE Gig Sanit; 1997; (2):58-60. PubMed ID: 9190346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. [Modern hygienic norm setting for occupational poisons in the air of the working area]. Korbakova AI; Sidorov KK Gig Tr Prof Zabol; 1992; (9-10):7-9. PubMed ID: 1305553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [A new toxicological concept-acute reference dose]. Liu Z; Chen B Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2003 Jan; 32(1):76-7, back cover. PubMed ID: 12731294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Methods of extrapolating risk from from high to low doses and their effect on determining MAC values]. Szymczak W Med Pr; 1996; 47(5):501-9. PubMed ID: 9026630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Acute inhalative exposure assessment: derivation of guideline levels with special regard to sensitive subpopulations and time scaling. Mielke H; Gundert A; Abraham K; Gundert-Remy U Toxicology; 2005 Oct; 214(3):256-67. PubMed ID: 16055256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Mathematical dose-effect models in the study of carcinogenesis]. Parfenov IuD Vopr Onkol; 1986; 32(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 3511610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Comment on "Steady State Solutions to PBPK Models and Their Applications to Risk Assessment I: Route to Route Extrapolation of Volatile Chemicals," by Chiu and White in Risk Analysis, 26(3), 769-780. Bogen KT Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1415; author reply 1417-8. PubMed ID: 17184387 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. [Quantitative methods of cancer risk assessment in exposure to chemicals]. Szymczak W Med Pr; 2009; 60(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 19746890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Permissible levels of exposure to hazardous agents in industry. Hatch TF J Occup Med; 1972 Feb; 14(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 5060739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Physiological criteria of evaluation of the functional status of the central nervous system in hygienic standardization of the electric field of industrial frequency]. Bezdo'lnaia IS Gig Sanit; 1989 Oct; (10):78-9. PubMed ID: 2599410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]