83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8143537)
21. Repeating cytology at initial colposcopy does not improve detection of high-grade abnormalities: a retrospective cohort study of 6595 women.
Rieck GC; Bhaumik J; Beer HR; Leeson SC
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 May; 101(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 16325241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparative utility of repeat Papanicolaou smears, cervicography, and colposcopy in the evaluation of atypical Papanicolaou smears.
Spitzer M; Krumholz BA; Chernys AE; Seltzer V; Lightman AR
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):731-5. PubMed ID: 3106869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparison of simultaneous cervical cytology, HPV testing, and colposcopy.
Hockstad RL
Fam Pract Res J; 1992 Mar; 12(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 1312758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions during pregnancy.
Jain AG; Higgins RV; Boyle MJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):298-302. PubMed ID: 9290443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of immediate and deferred colposcopy in a cervical screening program.
Parham GP; Andrews NR; Lee ML
Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Mar; 95(3):340-4. PubMed ID: 10711540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Management of the mildly abnormal Pap smear: a conservative approach.
Brown MS; Phillips GL
Gynecol Oncol; 1985 Oct; 22(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 2996992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An analysis of the factors involved in the colposcopic evaluation of 2194 patients with abnormal Papanicolaou smears.
Wetrich DW
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Jun; 154(6):1339-49. PubMed ID: 3717244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The evaluation of cervical cancer screening by combining speculoscopy with Papanicolaou smear examination in Taiwan.
Chang JI; Ou CH; Wu KM; Chen CC; Cheng KC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2002 Sep; 65(9):430-4. PubMed ID: 12433029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The degree of agreement between HPV testing, pap smear and colposcopy in cervical dysplasia diagnosis.
Melinte-Popescu A; Costăchescu G
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2012; 116(2):536-9. PubMed ID: 23077949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Towards a more rational policy for colposcopy.
Camilleri-Ferrante C; Camilleri AP
Public Health; 1992 Sep; 106(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 1410226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical evaluation of follow-up methods and results of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS) detected on cervicovaginal Pap smears.
Kim TJ; Kim HS; Park CT; Park IS; Hong SR; Park JS; Shim JU
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 May; 73(2):292-8. PubMed ID: 10329049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Colposcopic-histologic results in 97 patients with mild dysplasia shown by Pap test].
Crescini C; Pezzica E; Artuso A; Comerio D; Reale D; Bonaldi A
Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Nov; 43(11):509-12. PubMed ID: 1784407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A decision analysis of practice patterns used in evaluating and treating abnormal Pap smears.
Roland PY; Naumann RW; Alvarez RD; Kilgore LC; Partridge EE
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Oct; 59(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 7557619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Efforts to improve the follow-up of patients with abnormal Papanicolaou test results.
Block B; Branham RA
J Am Board Fam Pract; 1998; 11(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 9456441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Use of speculoscopy in the evaluation of women with atypical Papanicolaou smears. Improved cost effectiveness by selective colposcopy.
Massad LS; Lonky NM; Mutch DG; Mann WJ; Blanco JS; Vasilev SA; Finan MA; Scotti RJ
J Reprod Med; 1993 Mar; 38(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 8387595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Natural history of the minimally abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Montz FJ; Monk BJ; Fowler JM; Nguyen L
Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):385-8. PubMed ID: 1495693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of uterine cervical cytology and biopsy results: indications and outcomes for colposcopy.
Swinker M; Cutlip AC; Ogle D
J Fam Pract; 1994 Jan; 38(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 8289050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
