These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8145205)

  • 1. Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine.
    Colenbrander B; Feitsma H; Grooten HJ
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 48():207-15. PubMed ID: 8145205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology.
    Alm K; Peltoniemi OA; Koskinen E; Andersson M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2006 Jun; 41(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 16689883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying useable semen.
    Foxcroft GR; Dyck MK; Ruiz-Sanchez A; Novak S; Dixon WT
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1324-36. PubMed ID: 18775561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can external quality control improve pig AI efficiency?
    Waberski D; Petrunkina AM; Töpfer-Petersen E
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1346-51. PubMed ID: 18656253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fertility results of artificial inseminations performed with liquid boar semen stored in X-cell vs BTS extender.
    Haugan T; Gaustad AH; Reksen O; Gröhn YT; Hofmo PO
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2007 Feb; 42(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 17214781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo.
    Tardif S; Laforest JP; Cormier N; Bailey JL
    Theriogenology; 1999 Aug; 52(3):447-59. PubMed ID: 10734379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semen production and fertility issues related to differences in genetic lines of boars.
    Sonderman JP; Luebbe JJ
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1380-3. PubMed ID: 18783820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials.
    Holt C; Holt WV; Moore HD; Reed HC; Curnock RM
    J Androl; 1997; 18(3):312-23. PubMed ID: 9203061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New aspects of boar semen freezing strategies.
    Grossfeld R; Sieg B; Struckmann C; Frenzel A; Maxwell WM; Rath D
    Theriogenology; 2008 Nov; 70(8):1225-33. PubMed ID: 18774169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of genetic parameters of semen characteristics and reproductive traits in AI boars.
    Smital J; Wolf J; De Sousa LL
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2005 Mar; 86(1-2):119-30. PubMed ID: 15721663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification of embryo paternity using polymorphic DNA markers to assess fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa after heterospermic insemination in boars.
    Stahlberg R; Harlizius B; Weitze KF; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2000 Apr; 53(6):1365-73. PubMed ID: 10832760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality control in boar semen production by use of the FACSCount AF system.
    Christensen P; Knudsen DB; Wachmann H; Madsen MT
    Theriogenology; 2004 Oct; 62(7):1218-28. PubMed ID: 15325548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissimilarities in sows' ovarian status at the insemination time could explain differences in fertility between farms when frozen-thawed semen is used.
    Bolarín A; Roca J; Rodríguez-Martínez H; Hernández M; Vázquez JM; Martínez EA
    Theriogenology; 2006 Feb; 65(3):669-80. PubMed ID: 16019059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. High resolution light microscopic evaluation of boar semen quality sperm cytoplasmic droplet retention in relationship with boar fertility parameters.
    Lovercamp KW; Safranski TJ; Fischer KA; Manandhar G; Sutovsky M; Herring W; Sutovsky P
    Arch Androl; 2007; 53(4):219-28. PubMed ID: 17852046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of microscopic semen motility assessment at collection for a commercial artificial insemination center, a retrospective study on factors explaining variation in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Soštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Theriogenology; 2012 Apr; 77(7):1466-1479.e3. PubMed ID: 22289218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of factors affecting semen traits in artificial insemination boars from animal model analyses.
    Wolf J; Smital J
    J Anim Sci; 2009 May; 87(5):1620-7. PubMed ID: 19181771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Field studies of the effect of sperm motility and morphology on the fertility of boars used for insemination].
    Waberski D; Dirksen G; Weitze KF; Leiding C; Hahn R
    Tierarztl Prax; 1990 Dec; 18(6):591-4. PubMed ID: 2080503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing management of natural and artificial matings in swine.
    Flowers WL; Esbenshade KL
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 48():217-28. PubMed ID: 8145206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sperm chromatin structure integrity in liquid stored boar semen and its relationships with field fertility.
    Boe-Hansen GB; Christensen P; Vibjerg D; Nielsen MB; Hedeboe AM
    Theriogenology; 2008 Apr; 69(6):728-36. PubMed ID: 18242673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.