These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8145485)

  • 1. [Biocompatibility of silicone intraocular lenses].
    Wenzel M; Kammann J; Allmers R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Dec; 203(6):408-12. PubMed ID: 8145485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraocular lens factors that may affect anterior capsule contraction.
    Hayashi K; Hayashi H
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Feb; 112(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 15691565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Experience with hydrophilic silicone disc intraocular lenses].
    Hettlich HJ; Kaufmann R; Hunold W; Harmeyer H; Janssen B; Mittermayer C
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 1889778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An evaluation of the biocompatibility of intraocular lenses.
    Majima K
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 1996 Nov; 27(11):946-51. PubMed ID: 8938804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Silicone one piece intraocular implant and anterior capsule fibrosis].
    Auer C; Gonvers M
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 May; 206(5):293-5. PubMed ID: 7609368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prevention of cellular foreign body reactions to lens implants].
    Wenzel M; Ygge J
    Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(2):132-4. PubMed ID: 1855729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vivo study of cell reactions on poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses with different surface properties.
    Amon M; Menapace R; Radax U; Freyler H
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1996; 22 Suppl 1():825-9. PubMed ID: 9279679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrophobic acrylic and plate-haptic silicone intraocular lens implantation in diabetic patients: pilot randomized clinical trial.
    Elgohary MA; Hollick EJ; Bender LE; Heatley CJ; Wren SM; Boyce J; Missotten T; Spalton DJ; Dowler JG
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Jul; 32(7):1188-95. PubMed ID: 16857508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of AcrySof versus silicone or polymethyl methacrylate intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification.
    Li N; Chen X; Zhang J; Zhou Y; Yao X; Du L; Wei M; Liu Y
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):830-8. PubMed ID: 17964657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The growth behavior of mouse fibroblasts on intraocular lens surface of various silicone and PMMA materials].
    Kammann J; Kreiner CF; Kaden P
    Ophthalmologe; 1994 Aug; 91(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 7950127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Evaluation of the posterior capsule opacification in different types of artificial intraocular lenses].
    Pozlerová J; Nekolová J; Jirásková N; Rozsíval P
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jan; 65(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 19366031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluating biological tolerance of PMMA, heparin-modified PMMA and hydrogel intraocular lenses using slit lamp microscopy].
    Amon M; Menapace R
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1992 Feb; 200(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 1578872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Foreign body reaction after lens implantation. Correlation between visual acuity and density of giant cells].
    Wenzel M; Caspers S; Saari KM; Hayes P; Reim M
    Ophthalmologe; 1995 Jun; 92(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 7655199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vivo documentation of cellular reactions on lens surfaces for assessing the biocompatibility of different intraocular implants.
    Amon M; Menapace R
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 6)():649-56. PubMed ID: 7867821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility after implantation of sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome.
    Richter-Mueksch S; Kahraman G; Amon M; Schild-Burggasser G; Schauersberger J; Abela-Formanek C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1414-8. PubMed ID: 17662434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraocular lens changes after short- and long-term exposure to intraocular silicone oil. An in vivo study.
    Khawly JA; Lambert RJ; Jaffe GJ
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Jul; 105(7):1227-33. PubMed ID: 9663226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Surface quality of flexible silicone intraocular lenses. A scanning electron microscopy study].
    Kohnen T; Magdowski G; Koch DD
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 207(4):253-63. PubMed ID: 8587300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [6 months results of a randomized multicenter study comparing 2 silicone intraocular lenses with a PMMA intraocular lens].
    Klemen UM
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Feb; 93(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 8867157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy rates following phacoemulsification with implantation of PMMA, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses.
    Ram J; Kaushik S; Brar GS; Gupta A
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2001; 32(5):375-82. PubMed ID: 11563781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Change in capsulorhexis size after implantation of three types of intraocular lenses.
    Gonvers M; Sickenberg M; van Melle G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1997 Mar; 23(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 9113574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.