142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8146001)
1. Correlation of optotypes with the Landolt ring--a fresh look at the comparability of optotypes.
Grimm W; Rassow B; Wesemann W; Saur K; Hilz R
Optom Vis Sci; 1994 Jan; 71(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8146001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of the Lithander (Kolt test) pediatric visual acuity test with the standardized Landolt ring test].
Cavazos H; Schulz E; Rassow B; Wesemann W
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1990 Oct; 197(4):324-8. PubMed ID: 2280568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Correlation of letter optotypes with Landholt ring for different degrees of visual acuity].
Rassow B; Wang Y
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1999 Aug; 215(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 10483562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resolution acuity versus recognition acuity with Landolt-style optotypes.
Heinrich SP; Bach M
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2235-41. PubMed ID: 23828648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of optical defocus on the legibility of the Tumbling-E and Landolt-C.
Reich LN; Ekabutr M
Optom Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 79(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 12086306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of visual acuity levels in pediatric patients with amblyopia using Wright figures, Allen optotypes, and Snellen letters.
Mocan MC; Najera-Covarrubias M; Wright KW
J AAPOS; 2005 Feb; 9(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15729280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of display angles on the legibility of Sans-Serif 5 × 5 capitalized letters.
Cai H; Li L
Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):865-77. PubMed ID: 24290564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [How should visual acuity be measured?].
Langrová H; Hejcmanová D; Peregrin J
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1996 Jul; 52(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 8768473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of visual acuity measured with Allen figures and Snellen letters using the B-VAT II monitor.
Lueder GT; Garibaldi D
Ophthalmology; 1997 Nov; 104(11):1758-61. PubMed ID: 9373103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Legibility variations of Chinese characters and implications for visual acuity measurement in Chinese reading population.
Zhang JY; Zhang T; Xue F; Liu L; Yu C
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 May; 48(5):2383-90. PubMed ID: 17460306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glasgow Acuity Cards: a new test for the measurement of letter acuity in children.
McGraw PV; Winn B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Oct; 13(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 8278195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Landolt C and snellen e acuity: differences in strabismus amblyopia?].
Becker R; Gräf M
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2006 Jan; 223(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 16418930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Visual acuity for optotypes made visible by relative motion.
Regan D; Hong XH
Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Jan; 67(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 2308752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative legibility study using Chinese optotypes.
Cheng AS
Singapore Med J; 1991 Feb; 32(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 2017704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relative legibility and confusions of letter acuity targets in the peripheral and central retina.
Reich LN; Bedell HE
Optom Vis Sci; 2000 May; 77(5):270-5. PubMed ID: 10831217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [A new syllable text for evaluating near vision].
Kolling GH; Höltzcke P
Ophthalmologe; 1995 Feb; 92(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 7719078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating a novel concept of sentence optotypes into the RADNER Reading Charts.
Radner W; Radner S; Diendorfer G
Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 101(3):239-243. PubMed ID: 27881374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation-based evaluation of visual performance to reduce the statistical error of visual acuity.
Fülep C; Kovács I; Kránitz K; Erdei G
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Jul; 34(7):1255-1264. PubMed ID: 29036136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a visual acuity test using closed Landolt-Cs to determine malingering.
Kröger N; Jürgens C; Kohlmann T; Tost F
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 255(12):2459-2465. PubMed ID: 29046952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in the legibility of letters at contrast threshold using the Pelli-Robson chart.
Elliott DB; Whitaker D; Bonette L
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Oct; 10(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2263364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
