These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8146001)

  • 21. Measurement of visual acuity with two different charts; a comparison of results and repeatability in patients with cataract.
    van den Brom HJ; Kooijman AC; Blanksma LJ; van Rij G
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1995; 90(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 8549244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Optotype recognition under degradation: comparison of size, contrast, blur, noise and contour-perturbation effects.
    Westheimer G
    Clin Exp Optom; 2016 Jan; 99(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 26792583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Digital visual acuity test using calculator-type numerals with geometric gradation.
    Lewis JM; Smith TJ
    Ophthalmology; 1987 Feb; 94(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 3574877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Snellen visual acuity evaluation].
    Zapparoli M; Klein F; Moreira H
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 20098899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
    Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. High-pass spatial frequency letters as clinical optotypes.
    Howland B; Ginsburg A; Campbell F
    Vision Res; 1978; 18(8):1063-6. PubMed ID: 706157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [DIN-compatible vision assessment of increased reproducibility using staircase measurement and maximum likelihood analysis].
    Weigmann U; Petersen J
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 8963126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contour interaction in the preschool child.
    Fern KD; Manny RE; Davis JR; Gibson RR
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1986 May; 63(5):313-8. PubMed ID: 3717283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual Acuity Testing Using a Random Method Visual Acuity Application.
    Rhiu S; Lee HJ; Goo YS; Cho K; Kim JH
    Telemed J E Health; 2016 Mar; 22(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 26280910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What spatial frequency do we use to detect the orientation of a Landolt C?
    Bondarko VM; Danilova MV
    Vision Res; 1997 Aug; 37(15):2153-6. PubMed ID: 9327062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Serifs and font legibility.
    Arditi A; Cho J
    Vision Res; 2005 Nov; 45(23):2926-33. PubMed ID: 16099015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of blur and subsequent adaptation on visual acuity using letter and Landolt C charts: differences between emmetropes and myopes.
    Poulere E; Moschandreas J; Kontadakis GA; Pallikaris IG; Plainis S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Mar; 33(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 23297779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.
    Candy TR; Mishoulam SR; Nosofsky RM; Dobson V
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4307-13. PubMed ID: 21436270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Letter legibility and the construction of a new visual acuity chart.
    Hedin A; Olsson K
    Ophthalmologica; 1984; 189(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 6493696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Discrimination of paediatric acuity test optotypes by 6-year-old children.
    Hussaindeen JR; Ramakrishnan B; Ravi A; SundarRaj M; Rakshit A; Nosofsky RM; Candy TR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):964-971. PubMed ID: 37272135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].
    Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Test-retest variability and correlations between tests of texture processing, motion processing, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity.
    Simpson TL; Regan D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1995 Jan; 72(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 7731649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Visual acuity testing of three-year-old children using Landolt ring and picture targets].
    Kanda T; Kawase Y
    Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 1993 Sep; 40(9):893-900. PubMed ID: 8241539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The design and use of a new near-vision chart.
    Bailey IL; Lovie JE
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1980 Jun; 57(6):378-87. PubMed ID: 7406006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.
    Anstice NS; Jacobs RJ; Simkin SK; Thomson M; Thompson B; Collins AV
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0170839. PubMed ID: 28152076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.