These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8146589)

  • 1. Hearing aid fitting of preschool and primary school children. An evaluation using the insertion gain measurement.
    Snik AF; Hombergen GC
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 8146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preferred listening levels of children who use hearing aids: comparison to prescriptive targets.
    Scollie SD; Seewald RC; Moodie KS; Dekok K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 10783926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measured and calculated insertion gains in young children.
    Snik AF; Stollman MH
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Feb; 29(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 8580895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss.
    Quar TK; Ching TY; Newall P; Sharma M
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 23570290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of hearing aid fittings using insertion gain measurements.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A; Lidén G
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 6494804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A reexamination of the one-half gain rule.
    Berger KW; Hagberg EN; Rane RL
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 7409361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of two clinical versions of the articulation index.
    Humes LE; Riker S
    Ear Hear; 1992 Dec; 13(6):406-9. PubMed ID: 1487102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hearing-aid fitting in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Comparison of prescription rules.
    Snik AF; van den Borne S; Brokx JP; Hoekstra C
    Scand Audiol; 1995; 24(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8750750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA; Henry PP; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Hoover BM; Lewis DE; Kortekaas RW; Pittman AL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):902-14. PubMed ID: 11386477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ear dominance for nonsense-syllable recognition ability in sensorineural hearing-impaired children: monaural versus binaural amplification.
    Hattori H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):319-30. PubMed ID: 8219299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Hansen M
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The value of speech audiometry in hearing-aid rehabilitation.
    Parving A
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):159-64. PubMed ID: 1842284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hearing aid evaluation: predicting speech gain from insertion gain.
    Dillon H
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):621-33. PubMed ID: 8331918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prescribed clinician-fit versus as-worn coupler gain in a group of elderly hearing-aid wearers.
    Humes LE; Barlow NN; Garner CB; Wilson DL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 43(4):879-92. PubMed ID: 11386475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferred hearing aid gain and bass-cut in relation to prescriptive fitting.
    Leijon A; Eriksson-Mangold M; Bech-Karlsen A
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 6494801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acclimatization in first-time hearing aid users using three different fitting protocols.
    Reber MB; Kompis M
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Dec; 32(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 16039083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.