These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8147241)
1. The clinical performance of the Multiload IUD. I. The influence of the endometrial cavity length. Castro A; Abarca L; Rios M Adv Contracept; 1993 Dec; 9(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 8147241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical performance of the Multiload IUD. II. The influence of age. Castro A; Abarca L; Rios M Adv Contracept; 1993 Dec; 9(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 8147242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tailoring of Fincoid-350 insertions--experience with Hasson's Wing Sound 1 Cavimeter. Kaivola S Adv Contracept; 1986 Jun; 2(2):177-83. PubMed ID: 3776744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Length of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine contraceptive device expulsion. Bahamondes MV; Monteiro I; Canteiro R; Fernandes Ados S; Bahamondes L Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Apr; 113(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 21272883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of uterine shape and size using Kurz's Cavimeter. de Castro A Adv Contracept; 1988 Jun; 4(2):115-23. PubMed ID: 3213668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Twelve-month comparative multicenter study of the TCu 380A and ML 250 intrauterine devices in Bangkok, Thailand. Reinprayoon D; Gilmore C; Farr G; Amatya R Contraception; 1998 Oct; 58(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 9865999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dimensions of the endometrial cavity and intrauterine device expulsion or removal for displacement: a nested case-control study. Liang H; Li L; Yuan W; Zou Y; Gao ES; Duffy JM; Wu SC BJOG; 2014 Jul; 121(8):997-1004. PubMed ID: 24512656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical results with the TCu340 IUD. De Castro A; Rodriguez R; Pichardo D Adv Contracept; 1988 Dec; 4(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 3075425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do insertion-related problems affect subsequent IUD performance? Chi IC; Waszak CS; Wilkens LR Contraception; 1986 Nov; 34(5):497-503. PubMed ID: 3816233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The pathology of intra-uterine contraceptive devices. Buckley CH Curr Top Pathol; 1994; 86():307-30. PubMed ID: 8162713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of six new intrauterine devices. Boateng J; Chi IC; Jones DB Adv Contracept; 1994 Mar; 10(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 8030456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of echosonography in diagnosing IUD complications. Khomassuridze AG; Tsertsvadze GL Adv Contracept; 1990 Jun; 6(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 2206017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Side effects and complications of intrauterine devices with special reference to pelvic infection]. Marchino GL; Grio R; Garyphallides N; Zaccheo F; Carbone G Minerva Ginecol; 1986 Nov; 38(11):953-7. PubMed ID: 3808430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical experience with intrauterine devices in a private practice. Hasson HM Adv Contracept; 1985 Mar; 1(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 3842212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]