475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 8148030)
1. Microleakage associated with resin composite-cemented, cast glass ceramic restoration.
Blair KF; Koeppen RG; Schwartz RS; Davis RD
Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 8148030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Marginal adaptation of heat-pressed glass-ceramic veneers to Class 3 composite restorations in vitro.
Christgau M; Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Edelmann K
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 10823069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents.
Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival of Dicor glass-ceramic dental restorations over 16 years. Part III: effect of luting agent and tooth or tooth-substitute core structure.
Malament KA; Socransky SS
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):511-9. PubMed ID: 11725279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
Piemjai M; Miyasaka K; Iwasaki Y; Nakabayashi N
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):598-603. PubMed ID: 12488852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol-free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations.
Woody TL; Davis RD
Oper Dent; 1992; 17(5):175-80. PubMed ID: 1289863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retention strength of tin plated gold inlays bonded with two resin cements.
Eakle WS; Giblin JM
Gen Dent; 2000; 48(4):406-10. PubMed ID: 11199614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Microleakage of CAD-CAM porcelain restorations.
LoPresti JT; David S; Calamia JR
Am J Dent; 1996 Feb; 9(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 9002814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Marginal adaptation of dentin bonded ceramic inlays: effects of bonding systems and luting resin composites.
Haller B; Hässner K; Moll K
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):574-84. PubMed ID: 14531604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of dentin bonding agents on the proximal margins of ceramic inlays].
Kostka EC; Noack MJ; Blunck U; Roulet JF
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Sep; 46(9):615-7. PubMed ID: 1817944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro marginal leakage around Class II resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
Coli P; Derhami K; Brännström M
Quintessence Int; 1997 Nov; 28(11):755-60. PubMed ID: 9573868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays.
Rosentritt M; Behr M; Lang R; Handel G
Dent Mater; 2004 Jun; 20(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 15081553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
Ozturk N; Aykent F
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro microleakage of dentin adhesives.
Sorensen JA; Dixit NV; White SN; Avera SP
Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 1725698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro push-out strength of seven luting agents to dentin.
Cheylan JM; Gonthier S; Degrange M
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):365-70. PubMed ID: 12170851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Frankenberger R
Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
